I have been reading past threads about timing and vacuum advance. Several posts discuss ported versus non-ported vacuum, and how non-ported is better for various alleged reasons. For the experts: Why did GM design them with ported vacuum advance in the first place?
Also, I assume at proper idle speed with the vacuum advance hooked up to the proper ported fitting, that there should be minimal or no actual advance being applied. Since this is the case, why do the manuals say to plug the vacuum advance line when adjusting engine timing?
Also, I assume at proper idle speed with the vacuum advance hooked up to the proper ported fitting, that there should be minimal or no actual advance being applied. Since this is the case, why do the manuals say to plug the vacuum advance line when adjusting engine timing?
Comment