I consider myself an old dude, I am 70, body feels like 90 and brain feels like 30
One of my hobbies other than vettes is Trading Stocks, I was probably one of the very first daytraders in Canada, I started in 1981 when there was no online quotes and purchase confirmation occured at lightning speed which was the next day before close, same for selling.
The point of the rant is technology has moved well beyond this of course, and I would like to propose something here with the intention of Corvette Preservation to the members.
One of my endeavors in the stock world was to learn as much about Graphite as I could. I won't labor you with blah stuff but here is the jist of graphite. Graphite flakes can be 500 microns in size down to 5-10 microns. If a company has 500 micron flakes it can participate in virtually all the markets because it can "micronize" the flakes down to whatever they wish. So if they need 50 micron flakes for a specific purpose, they stick a 50 micron plate into the micronizer and "La Poof" what comes out is 50 micron flakes.
Which leads me to the purpose of this post. Rumor has it that the reason that Daytona Blue is so hard to replicate with today's paints is because the metallic flakes and blend are no longer available. That, in fact, no one makes the correct sized flakes anymore because GM used exceptionally small flakes.
So could we not investigate the possibilities of determining blend to then have NCRS investigate a company willing to try to micronize the flakes to see if we can "re-develop" Daytona Blue and Silver more accurately?
Most if not all Graphite companies, universities, laboratories have Micronizers. Now I quite realize that perhaps the polymers we now use may not be capable of size reduction, but I will leave that to experts, here, if any. Just a question to ponder
PS I quite realize we are not using acrylic etc anymore so this all is based on paint we have, not the paint we don't
PPS NCRS selling the only perfect replica paint may be profitable?
One of my hobbies other than vettes is Trading Stocks, I was probably one of the very first daytraders in Canada, I started in 1981 when there was no online quotes and purchase confirmation occured at lightning speed which was the next day before close, same for selling.
The point of the rant is technology has moved well beyond this of course, and I would like to propose something here with the intention of Corvette Preservation to the members.
One of my endeavors in the stock world was to learn as much about Graphite as I could. I won't labor you with blah stuff but here is the jist of graphite. Graphite flakes can be 500 microns in size down to 5-10 microns. If a company has 500 micron flakes it can participate in virtually all the markets because it can "micronize" the flakes down to whatever they wish. So if they need 50 micron flakes for a specific purpose, they stick a 50 micron plate into the micronizer and "La Poof" what comes out is 50 micron flakes.
Which leads me to the purpose of this post. Rumor has it that the reason that Daytona Blue is so hard to replicate with today's paints is because the metallic flakes and blend are no longer available. That, in fact, no one makes the correct sized flakes anymore because GM used exceptionally small flakes.
So could we not investigate the possibilities of determining blend to then have NCRS investigate a company willing to try to micronize the flakes to see if we can "re-develop" Daytona Blue and Silver more accurately?
Most if not all Graphite companies, universities, laboratories have Micronizers. Now I quite realize that perhaps the polymers we now use may not be capable of size reduction, but I will leave that to experts, here, if any. Just a question to ponder
PS I quite realize we are not using acrylic etc anymore so this all is based on paint we have, not the paint we don't
PPS NCRS selling the only perfect replica paint may be profitable?
Comment