C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP - NCRS Discussion Boards

C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Donald H.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • November 2, 2009
    • 2580

    C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

    My 1960 is a CU code engine (see photo of pad), but it looks like sometime in its past life it was converted to 245 HP. I verified on a thread yesterday that I have 245 carbs. I spoke to Robbie Kunz (Bob's son) yesterday and he said they could convert the 245 carbs to 270 without much additional cost over their normal rebuild price. I.e. the air valve weight change out, etc.

    I took the intake off this morning and took out a lifter (see pictures). I am new to this, but given the hole in the side of the lifter, I assume this is a hydraulic lifter?

    Is there any good reason that I should not purchase a correct cam, lifters, etc. and convert this back to a 270HP solid lifter engine?

    Thanks,
    Don
    Attached Files
    Don Harris
    Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
    Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)
  • Joe R.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • May 31, 2006
    • 1822

    #2
    Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

    Don,

    If it were me I would convert back to 270 hp. Maybe even do a little head massaging for a bit more power. I'm not very familiar with C1s, is there anything else different between 245 and 270 hp? Heads? Intake? Block?

    Joe

    Comment

    • Donald H.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • November 2, 2009
      • 2580

      #3
      Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

      Originally posted by Joe Raine (45823)
      Don,

      If it were me I would convert back to 270 hp. Maybe even do a little head massaging for a bit more power. I'm not very familiar with C1s, is there anything else different between 245 and 270 hp? Heads? Intake? Block?

      Joe
      I am included to restore it to what it is supposed to be. Just puzzling to me why someone in the past went to the expense to change out the carbs, cam and lifters. Maybe just didn't want to mess with the solid lifters.

      This is my first restoration, so I don't know much. But as far as I have found out from the experts on this forum and other reading. The only differences between the 245hp and 270hp is cam/lifters, and minor differences in the carbs. The carbs are all the same castings but some internal differences, i.e. different fuel nozzles in the primary venturi, and externally have different air valve weight lever. But these are apparently reasonable to replate.
      Don Harris
      Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
      Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)

      Comment

      • Donald H.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • November 2, 2009
        • 2580

        #4
        Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

        Anyone else with suggestion? I still wonder why this conversion was made in the past.

        Thanks
        Don
        Don Harris
        Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
        Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)

        Comment

        • Doug F.
          Frequent User
          • February 1, 1989
          • 33

          #5
          Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

          I would think it was probably a case where the 270 HP carbs were separated from the engine at some time and when someone found a set of dual carbs, they were the 245 HP versions.

          Someone may correct me, but I was under the impression that the 270 carb jetting was overly rich in daily driving and that 245 HP jeting was all that the engine needed.
          Doug

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43193

            #6
            Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

            Originally posted by Donald Harris (51003)
            My 1960 is a CU code engine (see photo of pad), but it looks like sometime in its past life it was converted to 245 HP. I verified on a thread yesterday that I have 245 carbs. I spoke to Robbie Kunz (Bob's son) yesterday and he said they could convert the 245 carbs to 270 without much additional cost over their normal rebuild price. I.e. the air valve weight change out, etc.

            I took the intake off this morning and took out a lifter (see pictures). I am new to this, but given the hole in the side of the lifter, I assume this is a hydraulic lifter?

            Is there any good reason that I should not purchase a correct cam, lifters, etc. and convert this back to a 270HP solid lifter engine?

            Thanks,
            Don
            Don------


            What information such as casting numbers or stampings do you have from the installed camshaft?

            I'm not 100% sure these are not mechanical (solid) lifters. They could be piddle valve type mechanical lifters. It's easy to determine. Can you force down the pushrod seat with a screwdriver or similar tool? If not, they are mechanical lifters; if you can push it down, they are hydraulics. Keep in mind that mechanical lifters are rarely of 1 piece construction. They have a removable seat which is held in place by a snap ring retainer. They also have a hole in the side of the lifter body. Without such a hole, there would be no oil to the valvetrain.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Donald H.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • November 2, 2009
              • 2580

              #7
              Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

              Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
              Don------


              What information such as casting numbers or stampings do you have from the installed camshaft?

              I'm not 100% sure these are not mechanical (solid) lifters. They could be piddle valve type mechanical lifters. It's easy to determine. Can you force down the pushrod seat with a screwdriver or similar tool? If not, they are mechanical lifters; if you can push it down, they are hydraulics. Keep in mind that mechanical lifters are rarely of 1 piece construction. They have a removable seat which is held in place by a snap ring retainer. They also have a hole in the side of the lifter body. Without such a hole, there would be no oil to the valvetrain.
              Joe,

              Thanks, when I first took out the lifter I did try to push the seat down and could not seem to get it to budge. I will try that again. How easy should it be to push it down? I don't have the engine out or apart yet, so I can't get a look at the cam.

              Don
              Don Harris
              Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
              Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)

              Comment

              • Richard M.
                Super Moderator
                • August 31, 1988
                • 11302

                #8
                Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                Don, On my '59, I converted my CU/270 to 245 in 1995 after 10 years as solid lifter high lift cam. Here is why.......

                1-Engine always ran rich and loaded up all of the time
                2-Hot restarts were nearly impossible
                3-Valve adjustments were a pain
                4-I could never get a good idle adjustment
                5-Idle had to be higher than I preferred

                When it came time to rebuild I decided to step it back........ Hydraulic lifters and a new slightly aggressive hydraulic cam. I also found a replacement primary carb set up for 245hp. My secondary was a mongrel anyways and only worked on occasion so I left as is.

                When I was done, I was much happier. I could get a nice idle and the engine ran perfect for cruising around. I missed the throaghty sound from the Duntov cam/solids though. I preferred cruising versus racing so I felt I did the right thing for myself. And I didn't have to play with the lifter adjustments anymore. I was very happy about that. I was looking for drivability.

                Rich

                Comment

                • Edward B.
                  Very Frequent User
                  • January 1, 1988
                  • 537

                  #9
                  Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                  The sounds at idle are enough to justify the 270 version.

                  Comment

                  • Joe L.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • February 1, 1988
                    • 43193

                    #10
                    Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                    Originally posted by Donald Harris (51003)
                    Joe,

                    Thanks, when I first took out the lifter I did try to push the seat down and could not seem to get it to budge. I will try that again. How easy should it be to push it down? I don't have the engine out or apart yet, so I can't get a look at the cam.

                    Don
                    Don-----

                    It takes a good push to depress the plunger of hydraulics, but, if they are hydraulics, you should be able to push it down without monstrous force. You could use a bolt in the lifter seat in a vice if you wish to do the depression test that way.
                    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                    Comment

                    • Duke W.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • January 1, 1993
                      • 15610

                      #11
                      Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                      Originally posted by Donald Harris (51003)
                      Anyone else with suggestion? I still wonder why this conversion was made in the past.

                      Thanks
                      Don
                      Don't do anything to the engine until you get the next issue of The Corvette Restorer.

                      Duke

                      Comment

                      • Donald H.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • November 2, 2009
                        • 2580

                        #12
                        Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                        Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                        Don't do anything to the engine until you get the next issue of The Corvette Restorer.

                        Duke
                        Duke.

                        I just gave my carbs to bob kunz here in Carlisle. He is going to look into swapping the middle section from 245 hp version to 270 hp versions. I am torn between just having him restore them or also modify!

                        If I choose in the future to have the car judged then I assume that I need the correct 270 hp caebs
                        Don Harris
                        Current: 67 convertible Marina Blue L79
                        Former: 60 Red/Red, 2x4, 245hp (Regional and National Top Flight 2013), 66 coupe Nassau Blue, L79 (Chapter and Regional Top Flight 2017)

                        Comment

                        • Ted S.
                          Expired
                          • January 1, 1998
                          • 747

                          #13
                          Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                          I'd make sure whether the lifters are solid or hydraulic first. Also check the pistons to see if they're domed. The old Motors manuals I have show that the 270hp and 290hp engines had a higher compression ratio than the 230, 245, and 250 hp engines. Like others have said the carbs may have been replaced.

                          Comment

                          • Duke W.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • January 1, 1993
                            • 15610

                            #14
                            Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                            Originally posted by Donald Harris (51003)
                            Duke.

                            I just gave my carbs to bob kunz here in Carlisle. He is going to look into swapping the middle section from 245 hp version to 270 hp versions. I am torn between just having him restore them or also modify!

                            If I choose in the future to have the car judged then I assume that I need the correct 270 hp caebs
                            You will also need the correct cam, too. Tell us how the engine idled. There is a clear and obvious difference between the Duntov cam of the 270 HP engine and the base engine cam in the 245 HP engine.

                            According to the NCRS Spec Guide all engines except the Duntov cam, FI engine have 9.5:1 compression, and in stock trim they can run on mid-grade or even regular gasoline.

                            Duke

                            Comment

                            • Ted S.
                              Expired
                              • January 1, 1998
                              • 747

                              #15
                              Re: C1 (1960) 245 or 270 build decision - HELP

                              Originally posted by Duke Williams (22045)
                              According to the NCRS Spec Guide all engines except the Duntov cam, FI engine have 9.5:1 compression, and in stock trim they can run on mid-grade or even regular gasoline.

                              Duke
                              Well I guess my 1962 Motors manual must have a typo since it clearly states 10.5:1 for both the 270hp and 290hp engines. Seems a little odd since cams and compression ratio usually go hand in hand. Why would GM have run such a low compression ratio given the duration of the Duntov cam?

                              Comment

                              Working...

                              Debug Information

                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"