C1 - Weight distribution and spring rate

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Al C.
    Expired
    • August 1, 1999
    • 273

    #1

    C1 - Weight distribution and spring rate

    According to the specifications in Noland’s book, the front spring specs are: length 13.45 in. free, 9.72 in. at curb weight; and 300 #/inch rate at spring (110#/in at wheel). So 3.73 inches compression requires 1119# at the spring, which is 410# at the wheel. So, two front wheels must share 820#. That leaves from curb weight of 2926#, 2106# on the rear wheels. Spec says "capacity" of front springs is 800# each, rear springs 725# each - that would total 3050#, versus loaded weight 3226#. What’s wrong with this picture?
    ... Al ‘58 #378 245hp NCRS SACC
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 1, 1993
    • 15229

    #2
    Re: C1 - Weight distribution and spring rate

    You have to multiply the wheel rate times wheel vertical movement from the point where the suspension begins to compress the spring, which will probably be about double the actual spring compression due to the leverage ratio.

    Duke

    Comment

    • Al C.
      Expired
      • August 1, 1999
      • 273

      #3
      Re: C1 - Weight distribution and spring rate

      Hi Duke -
      Isn't that the "330#/in at spring" vs. "110#/in at wheel" relationship, or is there more that I'm missing?
      ... Al

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15229

        #4
        Re: C1 - Weight distribution and spring rate

        You multiply spring rate times spring compression to compute spring load.

        The load at the wheel is wheel rate times TOTAL wheel movement from the point where it begins compressing the spring to normal ride height. You would have to disassemble the kingpins to determine where the control arm actually begins compressing the spring as there is some compression at the rebound stop.

        As far as the total spring loads are concerned, I can't account for the discrepency between "spring capacity" and vehicle weight, but I don't think it's something should be concerned about vis-a-vis spring durability.

        Duke

        Comment

        Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"