Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

[John Hinckley (29964)]

Just signed on, and four of the first ten posts I clicked on generated a screen with the following (instead of the post):

Error 500: Internal Server Error
Your request could not be processed due to an internal server error. The server was probably busy handling other requests. Use your back button and retry your request. If you were making an order rest assured that you will not be double billed if there was a server error.

Copyright © 1997 -- 2002. All Rights Reserved.
Administrator

[Craig Schultz (29385)]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

John - I am getting the same errore on the 63 turn signal post...but no others so far...Craig

[Harmon Chamberlain (24961)]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

John No worry if you are billed double 0x0=0. This site has not had a glitch in a long time but it has one now. Lyle

[John Waggoner (107)]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John? *TL*

The server was real busy about that time. There is a threat of Web Site Hijacking this weekend. I was just doing a precautionary backup. When was the last time you backed up your system?

[William Clupper (618)]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

Problem still exists @ 7:30 ???

[Craig Schultz (29385)]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

Bill - it seems to be only on the posts that were placed in the earlier time frame today, and they remain as permanent errors on the postings. Current posts seem to work....Craig

[Robert Wilson (1334)]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

John - There appears to be a string prior to your post that gives this message starting with Bramlett's post for me. After your post anything posted is readable.

[Len Rayca]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

John: I just tried the thread "63 turn signal " @ 7:38 PM eastern daylight time and received the error message.

[Craig Schultz (29385)]

Re: Error 500: Internal Server Error - John?

I think the problem remains and relates to the posting itself, not related to accessing it later...Craig