Re: I'm with Mike
OK. I got the casting number and date off the block.
C 9 5 (March 9, 1965)
The engine is 2 months newer than the build date of the car. Very unusal !!! Again, if it were a re-stamp, then why put a foward date? I wonder if Joe is correct? Has anyone else had a similar dilema?
OK. I got the casting number and date off the block.
C 9 5 (March 9, 1965)
The engine is 2 months newer than the build date of the car. Very unusal !!! Again, if it were a re-stamp, then why put a foward date? I wonder if Joe is correct? Has anyone else had a similar dilema?
Comment