Today, I saw a 30 minute program on TV in which the Barrett-Jackson
organization was featured looking for "Muscle Cars" that they could purchase,
prep, then sell at their auctions. One of the feature cars was a 340 Cuda that
they wanted to get for 20K. The seller wanted 22-25K, so no one budged. If
the past BJ auction taught us anything ( i.e 69 Z/28 going for 112K ), these
BJ guys will prep ( paint, decals, and other cosmetics ) this car and try to
double or triple their return. Who's kidding who? Give the seller what he
asked for it. BJ will clean up with the fools bidding on these cars. I did
get the distinct impression that BJ was going to turn that rather plain 340
Cuda into "something special". You know, sort of like the Nash Bridges Hemi
Cuda that wasn't really a hemi car ( actually 340 ci ) and it went for 135K.
In another segment, and this one killed me, Craig Barrett was reviewing a
"fully restored" 65 GTO. Only problems were: Over restored ( too good ),
a 69 GTO hood tach ( on a 65? ), tri-power induction ( originally a 4-bbl )
and an "upgraded" interior. What the heck does that mean - upgraded?
According to Craig, the interior "could have been ordered in the car when
original". With that logic, I'm going to turn my SS 396 69 Camaro into a ZL/1
because it "could have" been ordered from the factory with these options.
Does anyone else see the danger here? The lines are getting more and more
fuzzy now. Pretty soon, we won't be able to find original cars for sale at BJ
because the clones get better returns. Case in point is that 69 yellow Z/28
( JL-8, etc. ) that went for big bucks at the last BJ auction. Several people
mentioned that is was a "bogus" car.
What I'm really trying to express is that I always thought that the Barrett-
Jackson auction stood for something special. I've heard that one out of ten
cars reviewed actually make it to auction. So what does this all say when
Craig Barrett reviews a bogus tri-power 65 GTO and telling the viewer that
the car is very well restored. Very well restored according to who? I think
the answer is an unknowledgeable buyer. Am I being too critical?
Steve
organization was featured looking for "Muscle Cars" that they could purchase,
prep, then sell at their auctions. One of the feature cars was a 340 Cuda that
they wanted to get for 20K. The seller wanted 22-25K, so no one budged. If
the past BJ auction taught us anything ( i.e 69 Z/28 going for 112K ), these
BJ guys will prep ( paint, decals, and other cosmetics ) this car and try to
double or triple their return. Who's kidding who? Give the seller what he
asked for it. BJ will clean up with the fools bidding on these cars. I did
get the distinct impression that BJ was going to turn that rather plain 340
Cuda into "something special". You know, sort of like the Nash Bridges Hemi
Cuda that wasn't really a hemi car ( actually 340 ci ) and it went for 135K.
In another segment, and this one killed me, Craig Barrett was reviewing a
"fully restored" 65 GTO. Only problems were: Over restored ( too good ),
a 69 GTO hood tach ( on a 65? ), tri-power induction ( originally a 4-bbl )
and an "upgraded" interior. What the heck does that mean - upgraded?
According to Craig, the interior "could have been ordered in the car when
original". With that logic, I'm going to turn my SS 396 69 Camaro into a ZL/1
because it "could have" been ordered from the factory with these options.
Does anyone else see the danger here? The lines are getting more and more
fuzzy now. Pretty soon, we won't be able to find original cars for sale at BJ
because the clones get better returns. Case in point is that 69 yellow Z/28
( JL-8, etc. ) that went for big bucks at the last BJ auction. Several people
mentioned that is was a "bogus" car.
What I'm really trying to express is that I always thought that the Barrett-
Jackson auction stood for something special. I've heard that one out of ten
cars reviewed actually make it to auction. So what does this all say when
Craig Barrett reviews a bogus tri-power 65 GTO and telling the viewer that
the car is very well restored. Very well restored according to who? I think
the answer is an unknowledgeable buyer. Am I being too critical?
Steve
Comment