Did TCS (transmission control spark) take a hiatus from 1975-77 or is my Summer 2000, 2nd edition of the 75-77 tech manual missing this section?
1975-77 Tech Manual & TCS
Collapse
X
-
Re: 1975-77 Tech Manual & TCS
Prior to catalysts, "engine out" emissions had to be controlled to achieve the test bogeys. With catalysts, engine out emissions could be higher even though test bogeys were lower, so more conventional and efficient ignition and fuel calibrations were possible. The result was generally higher fuel economy and better driveability, but peak power was down due to the additional exhaust restriction added by early catalyst designs and GM's decision to use only one even on performance oriented cars like Corvette.
Duke- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1975-77 Tech Manual & TCS
Joe:
The 78-79 and 80-82 tech manual references TCS for some L48 applications. Not that tech manuals are always reflective of what rolled off the factory floor. I've got an L48 but with only TVS which ports to the EFE actuator. Another ports to the EGR valve and Canister. It seems like I've seen two...color coded (off thermostat housing) but can't recall where they went...perhaps it was EGR? But if not EFE and TCS...then what?
The 78 AIM references a 1242101 switch on 7A page 14...but then the sheet shows a cancel. Not sure is this is switch or not.Tom Russo
78 SA NCRS 5 Star Bowtie78 Pace Car L82 M2100 MY/TR/Conv- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1975-77 Tech Manual & TCS
Tom----
I don't think that the 7A, sheet 14 involves anything to do with TCS.
For TCS to exist, there has to be some sort of transmission or linkage mounted switch or relay. None were used after 1974 so I don't see how TCS could have been used.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1975-77 Tech Manual & TCS
I have seen this before with our late model manuals...and probably equally so for earlier manuals but systems are included on the basis of conjecture. Judges overlook it because it does not get seen on the judging field and somewhere along the way...a member gets motivated to find resolution to the quirk and finally the recommendation gets attention, earns credibility and gets adopted. This may be the case for TCS. But tell me what sources are you referencing that indicate it did not exist from 75 up?Tom Russo
78 SA NCRS 5 Star Bowtie78 Pace Car L82 M2100 MY/TR/Conv- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1975-77 Tech Manual & TCS
Tom-----
I can't find reference to TCS or related parts in selected 75+ Chevrolet Service Manuals, I can find no reference to it in selected 75+ AIMs, and I can find no record of any SERVICE parts for components of such a system beyond the 1974 model year.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: In other words
Once catalysts and converters were introduced...the emission technology landscape changed. Exhaust emissions could be increased through richer carb settings and higher timing to improve fuel economy and driverability. This would have increased performance but offset by the effect of the converter which restricted exhaust flow and therefore performance.
So why did Corvette not see ThermAC until 76 when it was first introduced in 1968? From what I've seen, GM "tinkered" until converters were available to take on NOx in 73 and in 75 with EGR and then catalysts. I realize from 73 through 75 Corvette introduced (or a return) to cowl induction.Tom Russo
78 SA NCRS 5 Star Bowtie78 Pace Car L82 M2100 MY/TR/Conv- Top
Comment
-
Re: In other words
Correct. I'm not familiar with the specific use of heated inlet air (I think GM refers to this as Controlled Combustion System.) on Corvette, but as least for the base L-48 engine, Corvettes could have higher proportional emissions than the other cars that used the same basic engine because Corvettes were lighter and required less power to run through the test where absolute emissions were recorded in grams per mile.
The cold air induction only became active at WOT, and the certification test did not require the use of WOT, so WOT emissions were not measured and had no effect on certification.
The first catalysts were "two-way" type that only oxidized HC and CO. NOx had to be controlled by timing and EGR as required for each specific application. Three way catalysts that added NOx reduction weren't used until 02 sensors with feedback air-fuel ratio control systems to maintain stoichiometric mixture were added as TWCs require the exhaust gas compostion of a stoich. mixture to both oxidze and reduce.
Duke- Top
Comment
-
Re: In other words
I'm not sure when GM began using a three way catalyst, but it would have corresponded with the use of "electronic feedback" carburetors and O2 sensors.
You can tell what kind of catalyst you have by looking at the emission control codes on the tuneup/emission decal in the engine compartment. "OC" is oxidizing catalyst. "TWC" means a three way catalyst that oxidizes HC and CO and reduces NOx.
Duke- Top
Comment
Comment