Another lower valance question - NCRS Discussion Boards

Another lower valance question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ian S.
    Very Frequent User
    • June 30, 2002
    • 264

    Another lower valance question

    I have seen references to the lower front valance on 66-7 having two sets of holes underneath and only one being used. Could someone explain this to me?

    Thanks,

    Ian
  • Wayne W.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • April 30, 1982
    • 3605

    #2
    Re: Another lower valance question

    Front holes for 66-67, rear holes for 63-65. The panels were made to fit all after the 65 run. But the production panel would have only been technically a replacement for the 65.

    Comment

    • Ian S.
      Very Frequent User
      • June 30, 2002
      • 264

      #3
      Re: Another lower valance question

      So just to be clear original 66-7 cars should show two sets of holes with one set unused?

      Comment

      • Stephen L.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • May 31, 1984
        • 3148

        #4
        Re: Another lower valance question

        Correct 2 sets of holes (for a 67 anyway....)

        Comment

        • Wayne W.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • April 30, 1982
          • 3605

          #5
          Re: Another lower valance question

          66 Also. Another interesting feature is the notch that is cut out of some 66-67s, just above the RH bumper brace. It has no apparent function. It is found on some, not all cars. About the only reason that I see for its existance is maybe for more clearance for the bowl there at the bottom of the radiator on a SB. But it is also seen on BBs too.

          Comment

          • Stephen L.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • May 31, 1984
            • 3148

            #6
            Re: Another lower valance question

            Funny you brought that up. My 67BB has that cutout also. I had not noticed it until I checked on the hole dimensions requested earlier in this thread. The car is damage free and I was wondering why the cutout. (There also happens to be a replacement piece on Ebay with a picture of this part and no cutout) BTW not a very uniform cut either... so I thought maybe there was a crack or something in that area and a previous owner just cut it out. Thanks for the explanation... and peace of mind.

            Comment

            • Bill Stephenson

              #7
              Re: Another lower valance question

              Wayne,

              ------Many of us out there look for the notch as a quick way of determining body panel replacement. For the purpose of discussion I would make the statement that all 66s and 67s came from the factory with this notch. If you dont see the notch you, more than likely, are looking at a nose that has, at least, had that panel replaced. Therefore, you might explore the nose further to determine if you can pick up on any more damage.
              ------This is similar to quickly looking at the two turn-signal corners for the 63/64 grille trim attachment bumps. Of course a knowlegeable fiberglass guy can cut the notch out of the valence and remove the bumps (obviously many have), but if the bumps or the notch or both dont appear correct on the car in question one should start digging because there will undoubtably be more damage to be found. Just my opinion.
              ------Oh, And I as well have never come up with a reason for the notch. The only thing that seems remotely plausible is that clearance was needed for the factory body-drop...........Bill S

              Comment

              • Wayne W.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • April 30, 1982
                • 3605

                #8
                Re: Another lower valance question

                Only problem with your theory is that not all had it.

                Comment

                • Bill Stephenson

                  #9
                  Re: Another lower valance question

                  Wayne,

                  -------With the General involved I would not make the statement that every last 66/67 had that notch in the lower valence, but I feel strongly that almost all of them did..........Bill S

                  Comment

                  Working...

                  Debug Information

                  Searching...Please wait.
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                  There are no results that meet this criteria.
                  Search Result for "|||"