Re: 62 splash shields

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jon Shade (21852)
    Expired
    • November 1, 1992
    • 202

    #1

    Re: 62 splash shields

    John, thanks for your response! That is all I really wanted to hear. I did get the idea that my local know-it-all had done his resto 10 years ago or better. It wouldn't be the first time he has mislead me. Thats why I brought it up here. I just couldn't see spending the time and money to repare my original if todays "repros" pass judging. I'll probably order the passenger side off Geoffrey or a new set if they only come in pairs. Thanks again!
    Best regards, Jon
  • Chuck Lyman (27958)
    Very Frequent User
    • August 1, 1996
    • 260

    #2
    Re: 62 splash shields

    Jon, just to reiterate, I got my splash shields from CC about 4 years ago for a 62, plus the installation kit and rubber seals. Everything installed fine. I had the shields setting around for a while and some surface rust developed. They come with a fine coating of oil, which prevents the corrosion if painted in a timely manner. I had to have them stripped of the rust before powder coating, but only because they sat too long in a humid environment. They were equal in thickness to my old originals. The installation after painting went fine.
    Chuck Lyman
    Kansas City Chapter

    Comment

    • Chuck Lyman (27958)
      Very Frequent User
      • August 1, 1996
      • 260

      #3
      Re: 62 splash shields

      Jon, just to reiterate, I got my splash shields from CC about 4 years ago for a 62, plus the installation kit and rubber seals. Everything installed fine. I had the shields setting around for a while and some surface rust developed. They come with a fine coating of oil, which prevents the corrosion if painted in a timely manner. I had to have them stripped of the rust before powder coating, but only because they sat too long in a humid environment. They were equal in thickness to my old originals. The installation after painting went fine.
      Chuck Lyman
      Kansas City Chapter

      Comment

      • Jon Shade (21852)
        Expired
        • November 1, 1992
        • 202

        #4
        Thanks Chuck! *NM*

        Comment

        • Jon Shade (21852)
          Expired
          • November 1, 1992
          • 202

          #5
          Thanks Chuck! *NM*

          Comment

          Working...
          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"