Part number help - calling Joe Lucia - NCRS Discussion Boards

Part number help - calling Joe Lucia

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • Nick Vigorito
    #16
    Re: Addendum

    Thanks Joe for your excellent posts! Makes sense. This tag just has me puzzled. If it is not the original tag, I can't figure why anyone would have one made with a part number and a date that don't go together (1967 part number and 1965 date). Further puzzling me is that when I bought the car the overflow tank was also dated April 1965. Hmmm...

    Nick
      • Top

      Comment

      • Nick Vigorito
        #17
        Re: Addendum

        Thanks Joe for your excellent posts! Makes sense. This tag just has me puzzled. If it is not the original tag, I can't figure why anyone would have one made with a part number and a date that don't go together (1967 part number and 1965 date). Further puzzling me is that when I bought the car the overflow tank was also dated April 1965. Hmmm...

        Nick
          • Top

          Comment

          • Duke W.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • January 1, 1993
            • 15610
            #18
            Re: Part number help - calling Joe Lucia

            That can was only used on '64 to '67 SHP/FI, so it is not common. I believe the weights should have numbers, but I don't remember what they are for the 069 dist.

            Duke
              • Top

              Comment

              • Duke W.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • January 1, 1993
                • 15610
                #19
                Re: Part number help - calling Joe Lucia

                That can was only used on '64 to '67 SHP/FI, so it is not common. I believe the weights should have numbers, but I don't remember what they are for the 069 dist.

                Duke
                  • Top

                  Comment

                  • Duke W.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • January 1, 1993
                    • 15610
                    #20
                    Correction

                    Not 069 - but 196 for '67 L-79.
                      • Top

                      Comment

                      • Duke W.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • January 1, 1993
                        • 15610
                        #21
                        Correction

                        Not 069 - but 196 for '67 L-79.
                          • Top

                          Comment

                          Previous 1 2 template Next
                          Working...

                          Debug Information

                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"