A question about C1 & C2 keys - NCRS Discussion Boards

A question about C1 & C2 keys

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gary B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • February 1, 1997
    • 6979

    A question about C1 & C2 keys

  • James F.
    Very Frequent User
    • December 1, 1985
    • 596

    #2
    Re: A question about C1 & C2 keys

    Gary,
    My original '56 Briggs & Stratton key, knockout not removerd, has a hole diameter which will pass a .171 (11/64) drill. Regards,

    Comment

    • Gary B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • February 1, 1997
      • 6979

      #3
      Has the hole ever been drilled?

      Jim,

      Is it possible that someone drilled out the hole to that larger size? I have yet to see an NOS B&S key blank with that large of a hole.

      I would love to hear from some original owners who still have their un-used 2nd set of keys available to measure.

      Gary

      Comment

      • John H.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • December 1, 1997
        • 16513

        #4
        Re: Has the hole ever been drilled?

        I have "A" and "B" keyway original B&S keys with knockouts intact, and the hole will pass a 5/64" (.077") drill, but will not pass a 3/32" (.093") drill.

        Comment

        • Gary B.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • February 1, 1997
          • 6979

          #5
          John. I assume this is for a 67 key. *NM*

          Comment

          • James F.
            Very Frequent User
            • December 1, 1985
            • 596

            #6
            Not by me nor to my knowledge *NM*

            Comment

            • Peter L.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • May 31, 1983
              • 1930

              #7
              Re: John. I assume this is for a 67 key.

              Gary - To the best of my knowledge and from the original keys for my cars and many examples the original GM/Briggs & Stratton keys and GM/Rochester Products keys. The keys that came originally with GM cars thru '66 and '67 and I think thru '68 production came with the larger 9/64" dia hole in the KNOCK-OUT plug. Fact is if you check the 1966 Owner's Guide (p. 5) you'll see a picture of the keys with the old style bead chain thru the KNOCK-OUT plugs in the keys. My read is that the smaller 5/64" dia hole in the KNOCK-OUT plug that is typically of the '69 and later rectangular and oval head keys was an engineering fix to get owners to remove the KNOCK-OUT plugs so it was less likely for someone to note the key code number and then have a key made and then "borrow" your car. There are later SERVICE GM/Briggs & Stratton '68 and earlier keys with this smaller hole in the KNOCK-OUT plug. If you are really anal, original "large" hole uncut GM/Briggs & Statton keys blanks will show signs of the nickel plating in the hole where as if someone has drilled the smaller hole out, the sides of the hole will show brass. Pete

              Comment

              • Peter L.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • May 31, 1983
                • 1930

                #8
                Re: Has the hole ever been drilled?

                Gary - While I agree that the size of the hole in Jim's '56 keys is somewhat larger than "new" keys, I expect it is because the keys are almost 50 years old and are brass that general usage wear from a key chain could well account for this. Pete

                Comment

                • Gary B.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • February 1, 1997
                  • 6979

                  #9
                  Pete: a follow-up question

                  Pete,

                  If the small (5/64") hole keys were for 69 and more recent and for service replacement keys for earlier applications, wouldn't this argue that one should not see any of the B10/B11 (octagonal/oval) keys with the small, 5/64", hole AND with the key code stamped into the knockout? Assuming that is, that GM didn't do the code stamping process on service replacement keys. Or did GM stamp the code into the knockout when one bought a service replacement B10 or B11 key from them?

                  Gary

                  Comment

                  • Peter L.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • May 31, 1983
                    • 1930

                    #10
                    Re: Pete: a follow-up question

                    Gary - I'm not sure there is a way to confirm you theory unless one can confirm the dates of manufacture; but I do have a potential data point that does not support small hole/stamped key code assumption. I have several "old stock" Original Briggs & Stratton SERVICE PARTS, Ignition Lock Cylinder Coded w/2 Keys Chev. Pass. 1968 that are "C" keyway keys (one of the boxes has a tab with a 1 68 date) that have key codes stamped on the KNOCK-OUT plugs but these have KNOCK-OUT plugs that have the smaller hole. The "C" key heads have the Briggs & Stratton/GM logo.

                    BTW, I suggest that the keys were stamped with the codes by the key/lock manufacturer, Briggs & Stratton; not by GM.

                    I believe all SERVICE replacement lock cylinders that were coded with keys had the code numbers stamped on the keys, as I have examples of NOS GM dealer SERVICE locks w/ coded cores that have Briggs & Stratton/GM logo small head keys with code numbers stamped on the KNOCK-OUT plugs (these have the larger hole) as well as "old stock" Original Briggs & Stratton SERVICE PARTS w/ coded cores that have Briggs & Stratton/GM logo small head keys with code numbers stamped on the KNOCK-OUT plugs (these also have the larger hole).

                    Pete

                    Comment

                    • Gary B.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • February 1, 1997
                      • 6979

                      #11
                      Thanks Pete *NM*

                      Comment

                      Working...

                      Debug Information

                      Searching...Please wait.
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                      There are no results that meet this criteria.
                      Search Result for "|||"