Gas tank vapor return nipple follow up - NCRS Discussion Boards

Gas tank vapor return nipple follow up

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chuck R.
    Expired
    • April 30, 1999
    • 1434

    Gas tank vapor return nipple follow up

    In my earlier post, I stated that I had the incorrect tank with no vapor return line nipple on the tank. Well now I do.

    I took the tank to a reputable radiator/fuel tank repair vendor who at a cost of $72.00, washed out the tank, drilled it out, soldered in the new nipple, and then pressure checked it all for leaks.

    I guess it's better than $100.00 (or more) for an un-known used tank or the $200 (or more) for a replacement.

    Now all is well and I can now mount the #%$*&^%#!!! tank with confidence.

    Chuck
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43193

    #2
    Re: Gas tank vapor return nipple follow up

    Chuck-----

    This will work, but I probably wouldn't have done it this way. Here's why:

    The tank that you have, if it has no fuel return line fitting is either a 63-E69 tank (if it has large "rounded" indentions on the ends; 68-E69 for only Holley-equipped cars) or a L69-70 tank originally used with Holley carb equipped cars (if it has "rectangularish" indentions on the ends). If it's an original or ealy SERVICE 63-E69 tank (SERVICE prior to about 1970), it will NOT have an integral pressure-vacuum valve on the tank. This valve is located on the top of the tank, about 6 or 8 inches to the left of the filler opening and appears like a quarter-sized, mostly flat, soldered-in piece.

    The integral pressure-vacuum valve was added to Corvette tanks in very late 1969 (my September, 1969-built car was among the first to have it). It was also added to ALL 63+ GM SERVICE tanks about 1970. "Authentic" reproduction 1963-E69 tanks generally do not have the valve, though. Most aftermarket replacement tanks do, though.

    This valve is A GOOD THING TO HAVE. Using it, you can use a non-vented gasoline cap. The combination of the pressure-vacuum valve and non-vented gasoline cap will significantly reduce the intrusion of gasoline vapors into the cockpit of the car, especially a problem with convertibles. That's why GM added the valves not only to PRODUCTION tanks after late 1969, but also to all 63-69 SERVICE tanks as well. For judging, you can always convert back to a "correct" vented fuel cap; it's really quite easy to do.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Chuck R.
      Expired
      • April 30, 1999
      • 1434

      #3
      Re: A couple or three things Joe

      This tank was a replacement purchased around 1977 according to the dealer data stickers that was still attached to the tank.

      Secondly, the DOES have the internal pressure vacuum valve.

      This tank is definately a late 1969 style tank probably for 3x2 applications.

      How were the Maine lobsters, still $4.99 a pound

      Regards,

      Chuck

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • February 1, 1988
        • 43193

        #4
        Re: A couple or three things Joe

        Chuck------

        Oh, I assumed that you were trying to save an original 1968 tank. No original 1968 tank had the pressure-vacuum valve. However, after about 1970, ALL 63+ GM tanks had the valve (thru the 1974 moddel year) so that explains why this tank from 1977 had it. Like I say, it's good to have it. Keep in mind, though, that the valves can start leaking in time. When this happens, a new tank is necessary. Although a new valve could probably be soldered in, I don't think that these valves are available seperately.

        I did get some lobsters for $4.99/LB. At restaurants I paid considerably more, though. I ended up "doing" 25 of them in the 2 weeks I was in the east; 4 of those I had with all my fellow Vetteheads at Carlisle.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        Working...

        Debug Information

        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"