Re: Loren...
I agree with Loren. I remember this debate from about 10 years ago. I even went so far as to send the National Judging Chairman a letter suggesting a possible solution to this issue.
My suggestion was to allow any color on a PRIME car, so long as the color and type of paint was available at the time of manufacture. It did have to be a solid color (no flame jobs, heavy metal flake, etc.). Then judge the car as if it had the original color paint on it.
I recall a really nice 73 convertible that was ordered by the dealer for his wife in primer. The dealer did not like the shade of yellow that was available in 73, so he ordered the car in primer and had his body shop paint it Daytona Yellow. Beautiful car. Tha car in primer would look awful. And it wouldn't get driven much like that. This is a case where we don't encourage the owner to drive the car.
Now, how do we handle a car with a paint code of SPEC? The owner has to prove what color the car was when it left the assembly plant?
I agree with Loren. I remember this debate from about 10 years ago. I even went so far as to send the National Judging Chairman a letter suggesting a possible solution to this issue.
My suggestion was to allow any color on a PRIME car, so long as the color and type of paint was available at the time of manufacture. It did have to be a solid color (no flame jobs, heavy metal flake, etc.). Then judge the car as if it had the original color paint on it.
I recall a really nice 73 convertible that was ordered by the dealer for his wife in primer. The dealer did not like the shade of yellow that was available in 73, so he ordered the car in primer and had his body shop paint it Daytona Yellow. Beautiful car. Tha car in primer would look awful. And it wouldn't get driven much like that. This is a case where we don't encourage the owner to drive the car.
Now, how do we handle a car with a paint code of SPEC? The owner has to prove what color the car was when it left the assembly plant?
Comment