Anyone ever heard of a 1969 350 - 350 A/C engine code in a Corvette of GD or GC? More later after I get some responses. Thanks
1969 Engine Code
Collapse
X
-
Re: 1969 Engine Code
Dick-----
The combination of options that this code represented (L-46 with C-60 and K-66) probably meant that not too many were made to begin with, so it's probably not surprising that you haven't run into many. During that period of time, folks that were "performance-oriented" and ordered K-66 probably wouldn't also have ordered C-60. Conversely, folks that wanted C-60 probably wouldn't have cared too much about K-66. I would expect that whatever of these that exist were ordered by dealership "ordering managers" for stock.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1969 Engine Code
Dick-----
The combination of options that this code represented (L-46 with C-60 and K-66) probably meant that not too many were made to begin with, so it's probably not surprising that you haven't run into many. During that period of time, folks that were "performance-oriented" and ordered K-66 probably wouldn't also have ordered C-60. Conversely, folks that wanted C-60 probably wouldn't have cared too much about K-66. I would expect that whatever of these that exist were ordered by dealership "ordering managers" for stock.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1969 Engine Code
Joe add 4 speed to the options you just mentioned. If the car that Jim is talking about is the one I have seen, it has not been out for many years. I do not think that it was ever judged at a NCRS event. I first saw it at a NCCC Concours in the late 80's or early 90's. At the time if my memory serves me correct the GC/GD codes were listed as a possible code. No one had seen one to verify that, in fact, they were actually installed. Chevrolet lists several codes that have not been verified as actually being installed in a vehicle.Dick Whittington- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1969 Engine Code
Joe add 4 speed to the options you just mentioned. If the car that Jim is talking about is the one I have seen, it has not been out for many years. I do not think that it was ever judged at a NCRS event. I first saw it at a NCCC Concours in the late 80's or early 90's. At the time if my memory serves me correct the GC/GD codes were listed as a possible code. No one had seen one to verify that, in fact, they were actually installed. Chevrolet lists several codes that have not been verified as actually being installed in a vehicle.Dick Whittington- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1969 Engine Code
Dick-----
The 4 speed comes "automatically" as L-46 was only available with 4 speed.
These GC/GD codes must have been very little-used. Some references don't even show them. However, I believe that Chevrolet records have verified that they were used. In general, a "G prefix" for the suffix code was unusual for the late 60s period. The GC code was used for some full size passeneger cars with 283 during 65-67.
I'll bet that there is an interesting story behind the use of these suffix codes. There must have been a reason why they were used. Normally, they weren't going to build "complexity" (i.e. more suffix codes than necessary)into the nomenclature system. Usually, when different codes were used it meant that they signified some difference in the engine assembly. I wonder what the difference was between engine assemblies with these "G-prefix" codes as compared to those with the more common "H-prefix" L-46 codes? I feel very confident that there was some difference.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
-
Re: 1969 Engine Code
Dick-----
The 4 speed comes "automatically" as L-46 was only available with 4 speed.
These GC/GD codes must have been very little-used. Some references don't even show them. However, I believe that Chevrolet records have verified that they were used. In general, a "G prefix" for the suffix code was unusual for the late 60s period. The GC code was used for some full size passeneger cars with 283 during 65-67.
I'll bet that there is an interesting story behind the use of these suffix codes. There must have been a reason why they were used. Normally, they weren't going to build "complexity" (i.e. more suffix codes than necessary)into the nomenclature system. Usually, when different codes were used it meant that they signified some difference in the engine assembly. I wonder what the difference was between engine assemblies with these "G-prefix" codes as compared to those with the more common "H-prefix" L-46 codes? I feel very confident that there was some difference.In Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
Comment