'93 LT-1 engines - NCRS Discussion Boards

'93 LT-1 engines

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steven S.
    Expired
    • November 1, 1995
    • 151

    '93 LT-1 engines

    I have heard that the new LT-1 motors have a problem around 68 to 70,000 miles with waterpumps. When the pump goes out it distroys the distributors. Is this a correct statement, if so, what can be done to prevent it? Change pump early?

    Steve
  • Chas Kingston

    #2
    Re: '93 LT-1 engines

    My '96 Buick Roadmonster station wagon has an LT-1 engine and the water pump had to be replaced at 50,000 miles. The Opti-spark distributor, mounted directly below the water pump suffered only minor damage, but I was lucky. Some on the Caprice/Impala board have replaced the water pump early and added a pipe fitting on the weep hole, with a length of tubing to redirect any weepage from there. That wouldn't have helped me, though, as my pump was leaking out the back. That distributor is a repair bill time bomb, just waiting to go off. An Engineering nightmare.

    Ol' Geezer

    Comment

    • Terry M.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • September 30, 1980
      • 15573

      #3
      Re: '93 LT-1 engines

      My experience with the Gen II LT1 in the B-body (iron head, former police cars) is that the water pump can be good for twice that mileage, especially if the cooling system is properly maintained. That includes every other year flushes and replacement of the coolant (regardless of the color of the antifreeze).
      Failure of the water pump need not be the death knell for the distributor if one is alert for the slightest leak from the "weep hole". If one allows the cooling system to deteriorate to the point that sudden catastrophic failure of the water pump occurs, the bath of hot coolant can sometimes damage the distributor.
      All that said, if the water pump needs replacing, one might as well change the distributor as well, if the mileage is close to 100K. I had a water pump fail suddenly at 128K. There was no sign of distributor issues, but I elected to change it anyway, since I was half way to the distributor when the water pump was off. Both parts were original to the car, so it seemed to me they had served their normal life span, and driving peace of mind was worth the cost of parts.
      Unless you are keeping your Corvette for the day when NCRS judges it, I recommend the modification of the distributor to allow vacuum scavaging of the distributor. There used to be a site that explained how to modify the earlier non-vacuum distributors to work like the later ones with vacuum, but I couldn't find it just now. Maybe someone else saved the link.

      This one will be useful:
      Terry

      Comment

      Working...

      Debug Information

      Searching...Please wait.
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
      There are no results that meet this criteria.
      Search Result for "|||"