C1 - 3736097 Cam - NCRS Discussion Boards

C1 - 3736097 Cam

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brad K.
    Expired
    • August 31, 1990
    • 414

    C1 - 3736097 Cam

    Somebody settle an argument for me......Give me the lowdown on this particular breed of camshaft (3736097). I also need some words around a comparison of this cam and a later cam (I don't know the number) that is similar but with different valve lash clearances.
    Thanks.........
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 1, 1993
    • 15610

    #2
    Re: C1 - 3736097 Cam

    Basically a good cam, which was considered a racing cam back in the fifties and powered Corvettes to several SCCA championships. It has mild dynamics so it's easy on the vavletrain. but it has more overlap than is really useful for a street engine.

    I recommend it for small valve (1.72"/1,50") 283s, especially if you are restoring an original 097 cam engine. A good alternative is the L-79 cam which has about the same duration with more lift and less overlap, but it has hydraulic lifters, so you have to limit revs to about 6000.

    I recommend the LT-1 cam to replace the Duntov and 30-30 cams on 327s and the '61 315 HP FI engine with 461 heads, but consider the Duntov or L-79 cams to be the best OE cam choices for small valve high performance 283s.

    Duration at .050" lifter rise and points of max lift summary is as follows:

    Duntov:220/220, 108/112
    L-79: 221/221, 110/118
    LT-1: 231/239, 110/122
    30-30: 239/239, 110/118

    Duke

    Comment

    • Clem Z.
      Expired
      • January 1, 2006
      • 9427

      #3
      Re: C1 - 3736097 Cam

      097 was the "duntov"cam used in solid lifter 283 engines,228/230 dur @.050,lift .395/.400, orignal lash was .012/.018 and later changed to .008/.012 for better top end. the 346,called the 30-30 because of the so called valve lash was the solid lifter cam used on the 327 engines,254/254 dur @ .050,lift .485/.485. the orignal lash was listed as .025/.025 but later change to .030/.030 maybe for better low end power

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15610

        #4
        Re: C1 - 3736097 Cam

        Duration at .050" lifter rise is a confusing measurement and makes hydraulic and mechanical lifter specs apples and oranges. For the 30-30 cam, Clem quoted the "industry standard" duration of 254 degrees, but this includes the clearance ramp height, which is not turned into duration at the valve. The valve does not start opening until the clearance is taken up, but essentially all lobe lift is turned into lift at the valve with a hydraulic cam.

        My number - 239, which is 15 degrees less than the "specified" 254, is based on lifter rise ABOVE the top of the clearance ramp, so it can be compared directly to hydraulic cams. My specifications are based on analysis of GM cam lobe data, which is specified to six significant digits, every camshaft degree.

        Duke

        Comment

        Working...

        Debug Information

        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"