Dear Sir or Madam:
Today I proudly joined NCRS. I recently purchased a 1967 convertible VIN #194677S105578. My concern is that there may be a discrepency between the trim tag and the protecto plate with regard to the interior. If so, it would make me concerned that perhaps the entire car was misrepresented by the seller. The seller did guarantee in writing that the car is an all matching numbers car and I am confident that he will honor that if it turns out that it is not. The trim tag indicates:
E07 (December body build date);
S3151;
Style 67 467;
900AA (Tuxedo Black);
STD (Black Vinyl Int)
The car also came with a Protecto Plate which indicates the following, in addition to the owner's name, dealer name, etc:
402 900 19467S105578.H
V1108HTH A01201W Z
P7T04
My understanding of this information is as follows:
402 900 = Black Leather Interior; Tuxedo Black Exterior
V1108HTH = Nov. 8; 327/350; High Lift Cam
P7T04 = Muncie 4Spd; 1967; December 4th
The H after the VIN indicates Holley Carb; the Z indicates a Dec. build month
A01201W = 3.70 Positraction; December 1st; Warren Motive Plant
As listed above, the VIN Number on the Protecto Plate matches the VIN number of the car, both under the passenger dash and on the engine pad. All of the numbers appear to indicate an early 1967 (December 1966). I don't know enough about the numbers to pin down a precise date in December. My concern is that the Protecto Plate indicates 402 which I understand to mean the car originally came equipped with black leather interior (the car does have black leather interior, which appears to be worn and all original).
Yet, the trim tag STD code would seem to indicate that the car originally came equipped with Black vinyl interior? If someone was going to go through the effort to forge a reproduction trim tag (or perhaps protecto plate), and the effort to get the December dates all in line, it doesn't make sense that they would overlook not matching up the interior codes? Something just doesn't make sense.
I carefully moved the rubber gas neck seal aside and inserted a flex light to see if I could get a glimpse of a tank sticker, in which case I would drop the tank. Unfortunately I was not able to see anything.
Is it likely that the trim tag could read STD and the Protecto Plate 402 without something being wrong? Please advise. This is my first posting and my first C2. I know I have much to learn and greatly appreciate your guidance.
Thank You,
David
Today I proudly joined NCRS. I recently purchased a 1967 convertible VIN #194677S105578. My concern is that there may be a discrepency between the trim tag and the protecto plate with regard to the interior. If so, it would make me concerned that perhaps the entire car was misrepresented by the seller. The seller did guarantee in writing that the car is an all matching numbers car and I am confident that he will honor that if it turns out that it is not. The trim tag indicates:
E07 (December body build date);
S3151;
Style 67 467;
900AA (Tuxedo Black);
STD (Black Vinyl Int)
The car also came with a Protecto Plate which indicates the following, in addition to the owner's name, dealer name, etc:
402 900 19467S105578.H
V1108HTH A01201W Z
P7T04
My understanding of this information is as follows:
402 900 = Black Leather Interior; Tuxedo Black Exterior
V1108HTH = Nov. 8; 327/350; High Lift Cam
P7T04 = Muncie 4Spd; 1967; December 4th
The H after the VIN indicates Holley Carb; the Z indicates a Dec. build month
A01201W = 3.70 Positraction; December 1st; Warren Motive Plant
As listed above, the VIN Number on the Protecto Plate matches the VIN number of the car, both under the passenger dash and on the engine pad. All of the numbers appear to indicate an early 1967 (December 1966). I don't know enough about the numbers to pin down a precise date in December. My concern is that the Protecto Plate indicates 402 which I understand to mean the car originally came equipped with black leather interior (the car does have black leather interior, which appears to be worn and all original).
Yet, the trim tag STD code would seem to indicate that the car originally came equipped with Black vinyl interior? If someone was going to go through the effort to forge a reproduction trim tag (or perhaps protecto plate), and the effort to get the December dates all in line, it doesn't make sense that they would overlook not matching up the interior codes? Something just doesn't make sense.
I carefully moved the rubber gas neck seal aside and inserted a flex light to see if I could get a glimpse of a tank sticker, in which case I would drop the tank. Unfortunately I was not able to see anything.
Is it likely that the trim tag could read STD and the Protecto Plate 402 without something being wrong? Please advise. This is my first posting and my first C2. I know I have much to learn and greatly appreciate your guidance.
Thank You,
David
Comment