An article in Road & Track (September 1956) discusses reductions in gross horsepower caused by various events and devices. The article was based on papers presented by the major auto makers at an annual meeting of the SAE.
One item really surprised me. Hot air into the carb DECREASED bhp by nearly 1% for every 10 degree INCREASE in air temperature. The test engine with carb setup generated 200bhp when the carb was fed 60 degree air. The engine generated only 177bhp when the carb was fed 200 degree air, all other things held constant.
I suspect that cold air impacts FI in about the same way. No surprise that GM added the cold air hoses to the FI 57's so quickly. A 10% increase in bhp would have been huge for performance based engines like the FI 57 et seq Corvette's.
But why in the world did GM limit the cold air hoses to the high HP versions of FI? The low hp version had the same air cleaner setup, but lacked the air hose connecting the air cleaner to the fresh air inlet.
1959 FI Low HP
One item really surprised me. Hot air into the carb DECREASED bhp by nearly 1% for every 10 degree INCREASE in air temperature. The test engine with carb setup generated 200bhp when the carb was fed 60 degree air. The engine generated only 177bhp when the carb was fed 200 degree air, all other things held constant.
I suspect that cold air impacts FI in about the same way. No surprise that GM added the cold air hoses to the FI 57's so quickly. A 10% increase in bhp would have been huge for performance based engines like the FI 57 et seq Corvette's.
But why in the world did GM limit the cold air hoses to the high HP versions of FI? The low hp version had the same air cleaner setup, but lacked the air hose connecting the air cleaner to the fresh air inlet.
1959 FI Low HP
Comment