Hey it's just not fair that I light the bulb for all you guys on flow rates, pressure drops, and trips versus four-barrels and not even know the flow rate on my trusty ol' AFB equipped 327/340. I think I've heard 550 CFM, but with no pressure differential. Don't know how far back the industry standard 1.5" Hg. goes, but probably to at least the mid to late sixties. Does anyone have any data for the old AFBs and WCFBs of yore.
I think the Holley R-2818 in '65 was 600 CFM, and I've heard that there were two basic quadrajets - a 700 CFM model and 800 CFM. Does anyone have any flow rate at pressure drop data for these old carbs. A reference would be nice, but don't be timid, hearsay is acceptable.
In the 1957 SAE paper on the new FI system by Dolza and Duntov they quoted the air meter flow rate at 24 pounds per minute, but didn't mention the pressure differential. That's not uncommon for a paper on a new system. Sometimes they give data out of context, so as not to reveal all the features of the design. Twenty-four pounds per minute only works out to about 300 CFM at standard sea level air density which is about equal to what a 283/283 would aspirate at 4000 RPM. I don't think GM ever published any engineering data on the FI air meters beyond this, so it's a matter of whether or not they were ever privately tested and someone having or remembering the data. I think the late air meter design ('63-'65) may have flowed a little better than the earlier design, but, again, I don't have any hard data.
Duke
I think the Holley R-2818 in '65 was 600 CFM, and I've heard that there were two basic quadrajets - a 700 CFM model and 800 CFM. Does anyone have any flow rate at pressure drop data for these old carbs. A reference would be nice, but don't be timid, hearsay is acceptable.
In the 1957 SAE paper on the new FI system by Dolza and Duntov they quoted the air meter flow rate at 24 pounds per minute, but didn't mention the pressure differential. That's not uncommon for a paper on a new system. Sometimes they give data out of context, so as not to reveal all the features of the design. Twenty-four pounds per minute only works out to about 300 CFM at standard sea level air density which is about equal to what a 283/283 would aspirate at 4000 RPM. I don't think GM ever published any engineering data on the FI air meters beyond this, so it's a matter of whether or not they were ever privately tested and someone having or remembering the data. I think the late air meter design ('63-'65) may have flowed a little better than the earlier design, but, again, I don't have any hard data.
Duke
Comment