Realistic flow differences on BBC heads - NCRS Discussion Boards

Realistic flow differences on BBC heads

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve Antonucci

    Realistic flow differences on BBC heads

    Hi everyone,

    I was recently looking at all the different oval port heads that GM made from
    1969 through 1975 and I have some questions. What were the basic changes in
    these individual heads? I know that the combustion chambers were tweaked to
    find better open chamber designs. What I don't know is if the intake and/or
    exhaust port designs were modified to increase flow. Does anyone here have
    experience with this subject? I know some of you are ex-racers and I have
    always enjoyed the level of detail you bring to these topics.

    Here are some example oval port castings that would support this topic:
    All share 2.06 intake and 1.72 exhaust valve sizes respectively.

    3933148 - 1969 117cc open chamber ( odd one-time application )

    3993820 - 1971 113cc open chamber

    336781 - 1974 113cc open chamber

    353049 - 1973 113cc open chamber

    If one wanted to modify these heads, will all of them support the use of 2.19
    intake and 1.88 exhaust valves? I'm working on a project and I have a set of
    the 3933148 heads. I like these because they use the larger spark plugs style
    ( pre-1970 ) and would be stealthy to the eye. Others have recommended either
    the '781 or '049 heads. Again, are the flow rates of these heads very
    different?

    I appreciate you help.

    Steve
  • Clem Z.
    Expired
    • January 1, 2006
    • 9427

    #2
    Re: Realistic flow differences on BBC heads

    there have been articles on BBC oval port heads and if i remember the best flowing ones are the 049 because they are open chamber and the flow rate can be increased with the instalation of larger valves.

    Comment

    • Mark #28455

      #3
      049 or 781 are the way to go

      You can add the 2.19 and 1.88 valves (some are using the 2.25 intake). Then you open up the port throat to match the valve. When that is done, you intentionally leave in a venturi to help the flow. In addition, I found a little benefit from using a .100 longer than stock exhaust valve and advancing the valve into the chamber, thereby lengthening the short side radius a little, but I'm not sure the gain was worth the hassle.
      Mark

      Comment

      • Steve Antonucci

        #4
        Re: 049 or 781 are the way to go

        Clem & Mark,

        This supports what I have learned. However, were there any casting differences
        to the design of the intake or exhaust runners ( length, shape, volume ) of
        these two heads? Could there be any differences due to water jacket layout,
        conbustion chamber, etc.?

        Steve

        Comment

        • Clem Z.
          Expired
          • January 1, 2006
          • 9427

          #5
          Re: 049 or 781 are the way to go

          i have no idea as i never used either type

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43193

            #6
            Re: 049 or 781 are the way to go

            Steve-----

            The REAL "way to go" for oval ports is the '391" casting (i.e GM #12363391) and for rectangular ports the '401' casting (i.e GM #12363401). These are the current-production big block STREET heads. They're "the best ones yet".
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Mark #28455

              #7
              the alum heads Joe mentions are nice

              but are obviously not iron. It's all about function vs originality. Externally, the 781 vs 049 are pretty much identical. I'm sure there has to be some difference in the casting somewhere or they wouldn't have assigned a new casting number - I just haven't figured it out yet. The 049 and 781 heads use the small 5/8" spark plugs, have a temp sender boss, and have a small rectangular casting mark on the ends about 1/4" wide and 3/4" high. Also some of the accessory mounting bolt holes on the ends may be different size than your original ones. You could probably have them pass judging on a 1970 or later (although I don't think the casting mark on the ends of the heads appeared until about 1971?). Hopefully I will get all of my parts out of storage in the next month or two and could give you more info at that time.
              Mark

              Comment

              • Steve Antonucci

                #8
                Re: 049 or 781 are the way to go

                Joe,

                Just for argument sake, what would a set of these '391 heads cost approx.?

                Steve

                Comment

                • Joe L.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • February 1, 1988
                  • 43193

                  #9
                  Re: the alum heads Joe mentions are nice

                  Mark------

                  Yes, the heads I mentioned are not going to pass for original heads, either the cast iron variety or the alumunum variety. If someone is most concerned about exact original external configuration, these are not the heads to use. However, if someone is concerned about performance and doesn't mind some difference in configuration, then the ones I mentioned are the ones to get. It just depends on what one wants.
                  In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                  Comment

                  • Joe L.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • February 1, 1988
                    • 43193

                    #10
                    Re: 049 or 781 are the way to go

                    Steve-----

                    BARE and from a discounting dealer about $1450/set.
                    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                    Comment

                    Working...

                    Debug Information

                    Searching...Please wait.
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                    There are no results that meet this criteria.
                    Search Result for "|||"