69 Q-jet points question - NCRS Discussion Boards

69 Q-jet points question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Greg L.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • March 1, 2006
    • 2291

    69 Q-jet points question

    Okay here is my situation.

    My original carb was a 7029204 but I now have a 7029207 dated I think if I remember it right around 1973 so it's obviously a service replacement...looks correct but has the wrong P/N and date. I have a chance to get a 7029200 with a date code a couple months before my assy date...looks correct, has a good date code for my car, is an original big block carb but has the wrong P/N so is still in the end incorrect for my car.

    I know it will depend on what I can get it for but from a points perspective would it be worth it to try and get it or just restore my 7029207 one and leave it at that?

    Any thoughts are appreciated.

    Greg
  • Jack H.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • April 1, 1990
    • 9906

    #2
    Re: 69 Q-jet points question

    Restore your original carb... When looking at a 'replacement', judges will divide the originality points in a 5-axis universe: Finish, Date, Installation, Configuration and Completeness. So, the replacement(s) your considering will each have the incorrect configuration (wrong part number) and as used also show finish wear. Figure you're going to lose 20% from the git go and maybe more when you consider other differences + condition. Your best shot will be via sending the car's original QJet to a professional restorer who specializes in Rochester (Kuntz, Luck) and have 'er restored.

    Comment

    • Greg L.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • March 1, 2006
      • 2291

      #3
      Re: 69 Q-jet points question

      Thanks Jack but my problem is that I don't have the original carb. When I bought the car back in the eighties it already had been replaced with a 7029207 service replacement. The cheapest 7029204 core that I have ever found would have cost me over $400. From a points per dollar view I wasn't sure if this was good value so I passed on it. So now I'm just wondering if I should just restore and use the 7029207 replacement that I have or try and get that 7029200 with a good date code and restore it. Any thoughts?

      Comment

      • Patrick H.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • December 1, 1989
        • 11608

        #4
        Re: 69 Q-jet points question

        $400 is about average for a core Corvette carburetor. I've got a couple at that price that I've purchased. One is on my 71 now, one is a spare and looks like it was hardly run when new.

        Then again, I've got two I purchased for very low prices for my 72 by watching eBay real carefully. They are spares in case the original ever goes bad.

        Patrick
        Vice-Chairman (West), Michigan Chapter NCRS
        71 "deer modified" coupe
        72 5-Star Bowtie / Duntov coupe. https://www.flickr.com/photos/124695...57649252735124
        2008 coupe
        Available stickers: Engine suffix code, exhaust tips & mufflers, shocks, AIR diverter valve broadcast code.

        Comment

        • Mike E.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • February 28, 1975
          • 5134

          #5
          Re: 69 Q-jet points question

          Greg--
          To answer your question from my perspective, It's a "so what?" if the date is right but the carb number is wrong. A wrong carb is a wrong carb, and won't get you any more originality points by having a correct date. Save your money by not buying another wrong carb, and wait and save until you find a right number, right date. Otherwise, a wrong carburetor in hand is less expensive than a wrong carburetor that's for sale.

          Comment

          Working...

          Debug Information

          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"