C2 water pump 3859326 other code? - NCRS Discussion Boards

C2 water pump 3859326 other code?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Alan Drake

    C2 water pump 3859326 other code?

    have located a 3859326 water pump core for my March 64 FI car - think that's the correct one.
    Noticed on the front on theother side of the shaft another number on a small raised boss - 176
    Is this a date code?? Did not think these 326 pumps had a date code!
    Please advise
    Thanks Alan
  • Michael H.
    Expired
    • January 29, 2008
    • 7477

    #2
    Re: C2 water pump 3859326 other code?

    Alan,

    As per several in depth discussions on this subject, I think most everyone agrees that the 3859326 pump never made it to production for the 64 model year. It's thought that it may have been first seen in mid 65 production.

    The commonly accepted casting number for the 64 pump would be 3839175. It's also possible that the 3782609 may have carried over from 63 to 64.

    I'm not sure what the "176" is on your 326 pump.

    Comment

    • Alan Drake

      #3
      Thanks I'll find a 3839175 *NM*

      Comment

      • Mark G.
        Very Frequent User
        • March 1, 2001
        • 227

        #4

        Comment

        • Mark G.
          Very Frequent User
          • March 1, 2001
          • 227

          #5

          Comment

          • Wayne M.
            Expired
            • March 1, 1980
            • 6414

            #6
            A caveat on "175"s

            If I recall correctly from earlier threads (Joe Lucia) confirmed that the 175 was produced over 2 decades, so a C_13_5 date could well be 1975.

            Comment

            • Alan Drake

              #7
              WP 3782609 or 3839175 which one is best

              Will need to find a water pump for my Mar 64 FI car. It appears that either the 609 or the latter 175 would be acceptable, however since I do not have anything now which is the better one to look for?
              Past post have lead me to believe that the 609 is possible for a 64, but not likely. I also believe the 609 has no date code making it a simplier upgrade.

              Was going to select the 175 since it appears that it was a 64 unit that everyone agrees about. Now if the 175 has a date code it just makes it a harder find.

              Thanks for all the info, I think
              signed confused

              Comment

              • John D.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • December 1, 1979
                • 5507

                #8
                Re: WP 3782609 or 3839175 which one is best

                Alan, I recently got a 609 pump for my '63 to replace the 326. But at our shows I find that the judges say you can't easily see the number and so if it's the correct configuration, has the correct bypass fitting with the proper logo in the correct size hole (no adapter) they give the owner a slash and move on. Meanwhile we know that we must have the correct part whether it is seen or judged. It's like paying mega bucks for an oil pan plug with a logo when a magnetic plug is the way to go. Can't see the logo anyhow with the car on the ground.

                Comment

                • Jim L.
                  Frequent User
                  • April 1, 1990
                  • 79

                  #9
                  Re: WP 3782609 or 3839175 which one is best

                  ho! but there is a difference between the 609 & 326 that is visable. the casting on the 326 is a larger dia. at the by-pass hose boss to permit a 3/4" fitting, where as the 609 is smaller and not large enough to make it into a 3/4" fitting at all. the 609 also has a rounded boss where the water pump pully just clears. the 326 has a flat edge in the same area, not rounded. i have both pumps in hand if a picture is needed to better describe the difference. it is very easy to tell them apart!!
                  jim
                  Jim Lennartz - FWIW
                  1963 SWC
                  Duntov Award
                  Bloomington Gold
                  Gold Spinner Award
                  Triple Crown Award
                  Platinum Award in Class
                  Best Restoration in Show

                  Comment

                  • Tracy C.
                    Expired
                    • July 31, 2003
                    • 2739

                    #10
                    no date code on my "175" Late 63 340 hp *NM*

                    Comment

                    • John D.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • December 1, 1979
                      • 5507

                      #11
                      Re: WP 3782609 or 3839175 which one is best

                      Jim, You info on the difference between the two pumps is something for else to learn. I will have my 326 pump back in a couple of days and will compare it the the 609. But I am sure the gang would like to see the differences. Then a sketch could be put in the judging manual. Thanks for your keen eyes.

                      Comment

                      • Joe L.
                        Beyond Control Poster
                        • February 1, 1988
                        • 43193

                        #12
                        Re: WP 3782609 or 3839175 which one is best

                        Jim-----

                        Your description of the differences between the '609' and the '326' is exactly correct. The "flat edge" that you describe on the '326' is actually a pulley relief that is cast into the bypass fitting boss. All '609' pumps were originally machined for a 1/2" bypass fitting. The '326' castings were machined for both 1/2" and 3/4" bypass fittings.
                        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                        Comment

                        • Joe L.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • February 1, 1988
                          • 43193

                          #13
                          Re: no date code on my "175" Late 63 340 hp

                          Tracy-----

                          The '175' waterpump castings that were used in PRODUCTION were not dated, as were the SERVICE castings available during the early 60's.

                          However, the '175' casting was used for many SERVICE waterpumps that were manufactured much later. These were used for all 55-68 small block SERVICE requirements and included a plug for non-external bypass engines. Later, the '326' casting became the predominant casting for small block short leg SERVICE waterpumps.

                          So, any '175' casting that is found with dates is a SERVICE casting. If one finds one with a year date of "4", that refers to 1974, not 1964.

                          If one cleverly and carefully grinds off the date on a later SERVICE '175' casting, then one has an "undated casting" as is correct for 1963-E65.
                          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                          Comment

                          • Tracy C.
                            Expired
                            • July 31, 2003
                            • 2739

                            #14
                            Thank you Joe. I appreciate your followup ! *NM*

                            Comment

                            • Joe L.
                              Beyond Control Poster
                              • February 1, 1988
                              • 43193

                              #15
                              Re: Thank you Joe. I appreciate your followup !

                              tracy-----

                              One thing that I may not have been clear on is that the '175' castings produced in the early 60's did not have dates and this applied to BOTH PRODUCTION and SERVICE units manufactured during that period. Later, the '175' casting was "resurrected" and used for SERVICE for all 55-68 Chevrolet small block applications (plus, 69-70 Corvette small block applications). After its "resurrection" the '175' casting "sprouted dates". All of these dated castings were the later SERVICE-only units.

                              '175' castings found with year dates of "2", "3", "4", and "5" might confuse restorers. On the one hand, they are told that original '175' castings used on early 327's with external bypass have no dates. On the other hand, they find a casting which appears to be "correctly dated" for their car (or, others) and it has dates. So, what's with this? Well, the "2", "3", "4", or "5" year codes refer to 1972, 1973, 1974, or 1975. Not a problem with Tonawanda castings, of course, which may have a 2 digit year code. However, I don't think that any of the '175' SERVICE castings were ever cast at the Tonawanda foundry.
                              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                              Comment

                              Working...

                              Debug Information

                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"