Shopping for insurance for 66 roadster.
Use of car seems restrictive for all carriers, based on my interpretation of website info the following senarios will not be covered under Hegarty, Grundy, AON etc
1.drive to my NJ shore house, park overnight in driveway
2.very infrequent drive to work, park in corporate garage with security presence
3.pleasure drive, parking at rest stop to get lunch and leaving car unattended in parking lot
In reality, how loosely are the use-provisions actually applied? Any carriers known for being mor-or-less strict? Would any claim for an incident under one of these senarios really cause a hassle, or worse, rejection of a claim?
Or is this small stuff and should I just go with a typical name-brand?
Thanks in advance for any guidance
-Bob
Use of car seems restrictive for all carriers, based on my interpretation of website info the following senarios will not be covered under Hegarty, Grundy, AON etc
1.drive to my NJ shore house, park overnight in driveway
2.very infrequent drive to work, park in corporate garage with security presence
3.pleasure drive, parking at rest stop to get lunch and leaving car unattended in parking lot
In reality, how loosely are the use-provisions actually applied? Any carriers known for being mor-or-less strict? Would any claim for an incident under one of these senarios really cause a hassle, or worse, rejection of a claim?
Or is this small stuff and should I just go with a typical name-brand?
Thanks in advance for any guidance
-Bob
Comment