1959 Stamp Pad - NCRS Discussion Boards

1959 Stamp Pad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jimmy J.
    Very Frequent User
    • May 31, 1988
    • 304

    1959 Stamp Pad

    If I understand the judging guide correctly an engine could have bad broach marks and correct numbers and letters and still receive 50 points. Is this correct?
  • Jack H.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • April 1, 1990
    • 9906

    #2
    Re: 1959 Stamp Pad

    Yes. The exact text of deductions for the engine block are published in the NCRS Judging Reference Manual, Standard Deductions section...

    Comment

    • Dick W.
      Former NCRS Director Region IV
      • June 30, 1985
      • 10483

      #3
      Re: 1959 Stamp Pad

      Jimmy, the point assignment would be 38 point deduct for pad surface as spelled out in the Judging Reference Guide
      Dick Whittington

      Comment

      • Jimmy J.
        Very Frequent User
        • May 31, 1988
        • 304

        #4
        (Message Deleted by Poster)

        Message Deleted by Poster

        Comment

        • Tracy C.
          Expired
          • July 31, 2003
          • 2739

          #5
          if they don't ask..don't tell *NM*

          Comment

          • Rob M.
            NCRS IT Developer
            • January 1, 2004
            • 12695

            #6
            Re: 1959 Stamp Pad

            I udbnerstood if the broach marks were wrong (or completely missing) your stamped numbers won't be judged at all (at least that is what happened with my C1 block which was decked but the numbers were still readable)...

            greetings,
            Rob
            Rob.

            NCRS Dutch Chapter Founder & Board Member
            NCRS Software Developer
            C1, C2 and C3 Registry Developer

            Comment

            • Joel Falk

              #7
              Re: 1959 Stamp Pad

              That has been my understanding as well. I was taught that the casting numbers are judged first on a pass or fail basis. Next comes the pad surface, also pass/fail. Next comes the pad surface, followed by build date stamp with engine suffix pass/fail, and last comes the VIN derrivative. I do not have the book handy but each of these sections is worth a certain number of points. If any section fails, the subsequent sections fail. So it is possible to have non-matching engine that is the correct casting date and casting number, with a good pad surface from say an Impala. This engine could still get most engine points even though it clearly never came in a Corvette. To me it is an entirely objective and fair criteria

              Comment

              • Jack H.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • April 1, 1990
                • 9906

                #8
                Re-read the text of the judging rule...

                You'll see there are places where if this section fails, it tells you specifically to skip the following steps, deduct so many points and move on to the next item. IF you sucessfully navigate the rule matrix down to the stamp pad, each of the items there (broach marks, engine assy stamp, final assy VIN derivative stamp), stand alone with no advice to skip judging the others if any one fails the test of scrutiny....

                Comment

                • Dick W.
                  Former NCRS Director Region IV
                  • June 30, 1985
                  • 10483

                  #9
                  Re: Re-read the text of the judging rule...

                  And another word for our sponsor If one has interest in the Judging program, a very important piece to have in his library is Corvette Judging Reference Manual available from the NCRS online store
                  Dick Whittington

                  Comment

                  Working...

                  Debug Information

                  Searching...Please wait.
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                  There are no results that meet this criteria.
                  Search Result for "|||"