the TI "box" used germanium PNP transistors
which were not much good in hot conditions.i put the originals on a transistor curve tracer scope and then found ones with the same wave form. the 632 was a PNP 100v gain 20,584 was PNP 25v gain 400 and the 643 was a PNP 70v gain 200. the power trasistor,632,could be replaced with a sylvania ECG 179,the drive transistor,584,could be replaced with a RCA SK 3014,silvania EGC121 or a motorola HEPG6005 and the trigger transistor,643,
could be replaced with a RCA SK3004 or a sylvania ECG102A.the diode,642,could be replaced with a RCA SK3099 or a sylvania ECG151A. this was back in the 70s and these were 1/2 the price of the GM parts. when these parts became impossible to get i quit rebuilding the amp. if you wanted to see what was in the new potted units i would think soaking it in MEK would dissolve the epoxy they use
which were not much good in hot conditions.i put the originals on a transistor curve tracer scope and then found ones with the same wave form. the 632 was a PNP 100v gain 20,584 was PNP 25v gain 400 and the 643 was a PNP 70v gain 200. the power trasistor,632,could be replaced with a sylvania ECG 179,the drive transistor,584,could be replaced with a RCA SK 3014,silvania EGC121 or a motorola HEPG6005 and the trigger transistor,643,
could be replaced with a RCA SK3004 or a sylvania ECG102A.the diode,642,could be replaced with a RCA SK3099 or a sylvania ECG151A. this was back in the 70s and these were 1/2 the price of the GM parts. when these parts became impossible to get i quit rebuilding the amp. if you wanted to see what was in the new potted units i would think soaking it in MEK would dissolve the epoxy they use
Comment