Re: My Thoughts
Terry------
Yes, I think that I have a real answer to the question you posed. Some time ago when I was trying to get an answer to that very same question I got so many different answers that I didn't have an answer. So, I just purchased a set of Comp Cams Pro Magnum roller rockers to find out for myself, once and for all.
I checked the rocker-to-valve cover clearance using modeling clay at all 16 positions with stock-type valve covers WITHOUT drippers (I don't plan or want to use dripper style valve covers for this application) AND using very thin valve cover gaskets (Earle's aluminum/rubber composite). I had PLENTY of clearance; WAY MORE than enough. In fact, with approximately 1/2" thickness of modeling clay placed at both ends and the rocker nut, I got no contact, AT ALL, when I rotated the engine through several revolutions by hand. I didn't bother to go further since I was very satisfied with the clearance.
For the heck of it, I did a cursory check with valve covers with drippers. I think that there would be no problem with these rockers, either. However, it might be necessary to use thick Fel-Pro Cork-Lam gaskets and/or slightly bend a few of the drippers. As I say, I did no extensive clearance testing with these since I don't plan to use them.
The Comp Cams Pro-Magnum roller rockers are a very high quality piece. I am 100% satsfied with them so far. I had thought seriously about purchasing Comp Cams stainless steel roller rockers or Crower stainless steel roller rockers instead of the Pro Magnum. However, both of those appeared to have a slightly greater cross section than the Pro Magnum. So, I didn't want to take a chance that the extra size would cause valve cover interference problems. As it stands now from my clearance tests with the Pro Magnum rockers, I feel that either of the other ones I mentioned would probably work fine. But, I didn't know that previously so I went with what I thought was the "safer" choice.
Terry------
Yes, I think that I have a real answer to the question you posed. Some time ago when I was trying to get an answer to that very same question I got so many different answers that I didn't have an answer. So, I just purchased a set of Comp Cams Pro Magnum roller rockers to find out for myself, once and for all.
I checked the rocker-to-valve cover clearance using modeling clay at all 16 positions with stock-type valve covers WITHOUT drippers (I don't plan or want to use dripper style valve covers for this application) AND using very thin valve cover gaskets (Earle's aluminum/rubber composite). I had PLENTY of clearance; WAY MORE than enough. In fact, with approximately 1/2" thickness of modeling clay placed at both ends and the rocker nut, I got no contact, AT ALL, when I rotated the engine through several revolutions by hand. I didn't bother to go further since I was very satisfied with the clearance.
For the heck of it, I did a cursory check with valve covers with drippers. I think that there would be no problem with these rockers, either. However, it might be necessary to use thick Fel-Pro Cork-Lam gaskets and/or slightly bend a few of the drippers. As I say, I did no extensive clearance testing with these since I don't plan to use them.
The Comp Cams Pro-Magnum roller rockers are a very high quality piece. I am 100% satsfied with them so far. I had thought seriously about purchasing Comp Cams stainless steel roller rockers or Crower stainless steel roller rockers instead of the Pro Magnum. However, both of those appeared to have a slightly greater cross section than the Pro Magnum. So, I didn't want to take a chance that the extra size would cause valve cover interference problems. As it stands now from my clearance tests with the Pro Magnum rockers, I feel that either of the other ones I mentioned would probably work fine. But, I didn't know that previously so I went with what I thought was the "safer" choice.
Comment