Interesting Find NOS LT-1 short block

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Terry B.
    Expired
    • December 1, 1988
    • 111

    #16
    Re: It's NOT a date code

    My friend also has a LT1 short block he bought in 1970 still in the crate. I have posted the info before. It is stamped CEOA48270 and cast date is D300 that is April 30, 1970.
    Original part number for the short block assembly is 3966921. The piston number is 3959456. Hand written on side is JJHJ. My notes indicate it has blue and pink paint on it but that could be on the two heads he also bought??

    Comment

    • Kevin M.
      Expired
      • November 1, 2000
      • 1271

      #17
      Re: NOS or Rebuilt???

      I don't know, I can't see any broach marks on the pad, looks smooth, and the stamp looks light. Could be the picture.

      Kevin

      Comment

      • Dennis D.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • March 1, 2000
        • 1049

        #18
        Re: It's NOT a date code

        Terry....

        Were those hand written letters located on the block, of the yellow crayon type written upside down identifying the engine code on the line?

        Comment

        • Terry B.
          Expired
          • December 1, 1988
          • 111

          #19
          Re: It's NOT a date code

          Yes, that is what I remember of it. I was back in Indiana several months ago and we pulled it out to look it over and rotate the crank. It cost $409 in the good old days!! I have the heads here that he bought and have been considering picking up the motor. I bought my friend's 60 Vette. The original intent was to put it in the 60. I have started piecing together a 283. It has a 327 now.

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 42936

            #20
            Re: Not even CE on the pad???

            Bunky-----

            The short block assembly ("partial engine assembly", in GM parlance) that I purchased in 1975 did not have any stamping on the pad. Others that I observed in that period did not have any stamping, either. However, that might not have been the way it was done for all such assemblies. While, GENERALLY, only complete engine assemblies had the stamping, it may very well be that some partial engine assemblies were stamped, too. Like so many other things, there were variations in procedures over time.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Joe L.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • February 1, 1988
              • 42936

              #21
              Re: Pic of the bottom - pink rods???

              Bunky-----

              Yes, these are "pink" rods. However, "pink" rods were not unique to LT-1's. They were used for L-46 and L-82, also. The pistons installed in this engine indicate either an L-46 or LT-1, though. The only difference between those 2 partial engine assemblies was the installed camshaft. There's no way to discern that from the photo.
              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

              Comment

              • Joe L.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • February 1, 1988
                • 42936

                #22
                Re: let's see the front stamp pad #'s

                Dennis-----

                No way can it decode to a 1997 manufacturing date. The 3970010 block and engine assemblies manufactured from it were LONG out of production by that time.
                In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                Comment

                • Joe L.
                  Beyond Control Poster
                  • February 1, 1988
                  • 42936

                  #23
                  Re: NOS or Rebuilt???

                  Bunky-----

                  I STRONGLY suspect that it's an NOS example of the GM #3966921 (1970 LT-1), or GM #3970653 (1970 L-46). Which one, I cannot tell you.
                  In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                  Comment

                  • Stephen B.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • April 1, 1988
                    • 873

                    #24
                    I enjoy all of the discussion and such

                    I learn something new everyday on this forum. I appreciate all of the input from everyone.

                    Comment

                    • Jim T.
                      Expired
                      • March 1, 1993
                      • 5351

                      #25
                      Re: I enjoy all of the discussion and such

                      I have a CE partial engine block that I have had since August 1970. On the front pad is atamped CE0A47538, a 3970010 block, with a casting date D260. The 0 in the CEOA is for the year 1970 from what I have read about CE engines. It should be a four bolt main, someday I will find out when I remove the pan.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      Searching...Please wait.
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                      There are no results that meet this criteria.
                      Search Result for "|||"