1967 Bolts - NCRS Discussion Boards

1967 Bolts

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brian #46951

    1967 Bolts

    I have had people tell me that certain bolt markings were used to afix specific parts to engine, body, transmission, etc. I look at the Judging Guide and about 40-50% of the time it will list specific markings for specific attachment bolts. My question is: If the Judging Guide does not list a specific attachment bolt for a specific part, can any bolt do? How many points are deducted if the bolt is not correct and yet it is not listed in the Judging Guide?
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43193

    #2
    Re: 1967 Bolts

    Brian-----

    I think that what's shown in the JG with respect to bolt head markings are one or more for any application which are known to have been originally used. Since a large number of different manufacturers usually supplied fasteners to PRODUCTION, others may have been used, too.

    I believe that, generally, fasteners with the correct head configuration and with PERIOD-CORRECT headmarkings will usually be accepted for most applications. There may be some cases in which special fasteners were used and, for these, there may be accepted only one headmarking.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Gerard F.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • June 30, 2004
      • 3803

      #3
      Re: 1967 Bolts

      Brian,

      There are a lot of variances with the Judging Guide and the real world in regard to bolt head markings. I like the term "most commonly used" which is probably correct 40-50% of the time. If you feel that a bolt head marking is the original bolt on your car based upon history, it is probably more correct than the Judging Guide, and argueable at judging.

      I have an original 67 with lots of variances to the Judging Guide in terms of bolt head markings. They just used whatever was available in the bin at the time of assembly.

      Jerry Fuccillo
      #42179
      Jerry Fuccillo
      1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968

      Comment

      • Brian #46951

        #4
        Re: 1967 Bolts

        Thanks to both of you. If anyone else has any input it would be greatly appreciated.

        Comment

        • William C.
          NCRS Past President
          • May 31, 1975
          • 6037

          #5
          Re: 1967 Bolts

          In addition to what has been mentioned, other things that will catch a judges eye are "hardware store" bolts without Manufacturers logos, or bolts from manufacturers that were not recognized GM supplier of the period in question such as Dorman.
          Bill Clupper #618

          Comment

          Working...

          Debug Information

          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"