Differential Series

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ray C.
    Expired
    • July 1, 2001
    • 1124

    #1

    Differential Series

    Could someone please describe the differences in the Corvette positraction differential series? I have read through the archives and read refference to the 3 and 4 series. I am most interested in differentials for the C-1's, but all information welcome.

    Thanks for any information!

    Ray #36314
  • William C.
    NCRS Past President
    • June 1, 1975
    • 6037

    #2
    Re: Differential Series

    The thickness of the ring gear is less on the 4.11 and numerically higher ratios than the 3-series ratios, requiring a thicker flange on the carrier of the "4 series" ring and pinion assembly. A three series carrier can accept a 4-series ring and pinion with a spacer between the ring gear and the carrier, but 3-series gears will not work in a 4-series carrier.
    Bill Clupper #618

    Comment

    • Bruce B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • June 1, 1996
      • 2930

      #3
      Re: Differential Series

      I also believe that the 4 series carrier has a square edge where the ring gear bolts on and the 3 series carriers have a beveled edge on the flange.

      Comment

      • Wayne M.
        Expired
        • March 1, 1980
        • 6414

        #4
        2 Pics - 3 series and 4 series carriers & rings

        Auto-load pic is of a 3.70 ring bolted to a 3-series "117" carrier

        link below is of a 4.56 ring bolted to a 4-series "175" carrier.


        Bruce, I think I can detect that (very small) bevel at the thinner 3-series ring/carrier flange interface that you mention.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • Verle R.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • March 1, 1989
          • 1163

          #5
          Re: 2 Pics - 3 series and 4 series carriers & ring

          I'm not sure the bevel is of any significance.

          Normal machine shop procedure will call for a slight bevel on intersecting surfaces, just to remove sharp edges. The machine operator and others had to handle the parts and they didn't want to cut their hands. In the years before CNC machining the bevel could vary considerably in depth.

          I would be surprised if any carrier manufactured in those days had absolutely no bevel.

          Verle

          Comment

          Working...
          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"