.................fully at WOT, with my engine on the dyno, turning 6000 RPM!!!! I have heard that question many times from people who have had their engines dyno tested, and noticed that the vacuum operated secondaries are not opening fully. Consider the following:
CARB CFM Requirement = [Engine Displacement(cu. in.) x Max.Engine Speed (Rev/min) / 3456] x V.E.(%)
Where V.E. = Volumetric eficiency, usually between 80-90% for normally aspirated engines.
Assuming (generously) a VE of 85% for a 327 cu in Corvette engine, running to maximum RPM of 6000, we get 482.55 CFM. A typical Holley 2118 carb is rated at 600 CFM (max), but the engine only needs 482, so the carb has plenty of margin. This engine can either be modified to rev higher, and/or breathe with a higher VE, and still utilize the stock carburetor.
This discussion does NOT factor in jet sizing, whose determination can only be analyzed by accurate A/F mixture measurements at various engine speeds.
I would think that, if the secondary butterflies on their VACUUM CONTROLLED SECONDARY ("single pumper")open fully, then the carburetor is probably undersized.
Is this a valid analysis?
Many people blame the secondary diaphragm spring for this, but, AFAIAC, the spring only affects the TIMING of the opening, because the spring sets the resistance against which engine vacuum must work in order to actuate the secondary plates.
Does the secondary diaphragm spring affect the "full open" point, as well as the timing, or is the "full open" point determined by air density, flow area, and VELOCITY, as expressed by:
Mass flow rate = Rho . V . A (for subsonic flow)
Where Rho = density
V = flow velocity
A = flow area
Joe
CARB CFM Requirement = [Engine Displacement(cu. in.) x Max.Engine Speed (Rev/min) / 3456] x V.E.(%)
Where V.E. = Volumetric eficiency, usually between 80-90% for normally aspirated engines.
Assuming (generously) a VE of 85% for a 327 cu in Corvette engine, running to maximum RPM of 6000, we get 482.55 CFM. A typical Holley 2118 carb is rated at 600 CFM (max), but the engine only needs 482, so the carb has plenty of margin. This engine can either be modified to rev higher, and/or breathe with a higher VE, and still utilize the stock carburetor.
This discussion does NOT factor in jet sizing, whose determination can only be analyzed by accurate A/F mixture measurements at various engine speeds.
I would think that, if the secondary butterflies on their VACUUM CONTROLLED SECONDARY ("single pumper")open fully, then the carburetor is probably undersized.
Is this a valid analysis?
Many people blame the secondary diaphragm spring for this, but, AFAIAC, the spring only affects the TIMING of the opening, because the spring sets the resistance against which engine vacuum must work in order to actuate the secondary plates.
Does the secondary diaphragm spring affect the "full open" point, as well as the timing, or is the "full open" point determined by air density, flow area, and VELOCITY, as expressed by:
Mass flow rate = Rho . V . A (for subsonic flow)
Where Rho = density
V = flow velocity
A = flow area
Joe
Comment