Four-way hazard warning switch - NCRS Discussion Boards

Four-way hazard warning switch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike Sasser

    Four-way hazard warning switch

    I know that 1966 was supposed to be the first year that option V74, four-way hazzard warning switch was installed but my late 65 has it and it sure looks factory installed. Could it have been put in a few 65's at the end of the production run?
  • Jack H.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • April 1, 1990
    • 9906

    #2
    Re: Four-way hazard warning switch

    My vote is no (did factory install).... The option wasn't on the dealer order form in '65. More likely it was added after the fact. Only possiblity I can conjure would be if car went through engineering as a test vehicle and was subsequently disposed of. Even then, NCRS judging rules would put the burden of proof upon you, the owner, to document an event that runs counter to accepted production norms of the era.

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43193

      #3
      Re: Four-way hazard warning switch

      Mike---

      I think that it's very possible. In fact, if 1965 Corvettes received a hazard flasher unit, the switch would have been GM #986294. For 1966, this switch changed to GM #986639. GM #986294 was discontinued in May, 1966 and GM #986639 was discontinued in May, 1967. So, you don't want to need one of these switches. However, if you do, the 65 switch was also used in 1965 full size Chevrolet passenger cars and the 1966 switch was used in full size 1966 Chevrolet passenger cars.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Mike Sasser

        #4
        thanks for your help

        after crawling up under the dash, not good for my back, I am pretty sure it isn't original, the wiring harness just doesn't look right. I don't know why someone would go to all that trouble to add 4-way flashers. I think I will remove it.

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • February 1, 1988
          • 43193

          #5
          Re: thanks for your help

          Mike----

          I would not be too quick to remove it. If this were a "first year" factory installation, it could be rather crude. I totally agree with you on the point of not understanding why someone would add such a device to the car. I don't understand it, either. In fact, that's one of the reasons that I mentioned that I thought there was the possibility that it was factory-installed.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          Working...

          Debug Information

          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"