Re: pilot bearing question
Joe, I don't know if this help's. Back in the late 1960's, I helped swap a 1958 348/250hp engine out of a full size Chevy, that originally had a Turboglide transmission, into a 1960 Impala that had a manual transmission. When we tried to install the pilot bushing in the 348 crankshaft, we found it was a smaller inside diameter than the new pilot bearing outside diameter. At the time, the easiest way to make it fit, was to grind down the outdide diameter of the new pilot gearing, until it would fit the 348 crankshaft hole. It worked fine, with no problems, for years. If I remember correctly, I don't think the 348 engine crankshaft (possibly 283's with Turboglide, also), if used with a Turboglide transmission was even machined to accept a pilot bearing, just a rough hole. I believe after the Turboglide transmission was no longer offered, GM started machining all cranks to accept a pilot bearing. FWIW. Dave
Joe, I don't know if this help's. Back in the late 1960's, I helped swap a 1958 348/250hp engine out of a full size Chevy, that originally had a Turboglide transmission, into a 1960 Impala that had a manual transmission. When we tried to install the pilot bushing in the 348 crankshaft, we found it was a smaller inside diameter than the new pilot bearing outside diameter. At the time, the easiest way to make it fit, was to grind down the outdide diameter of the new pilot gearing, until it would fit the 348 crankshaft hole. It worked fine, with no problems, for years. If I remember correctly, I don't think the 348 engine crankshaft (possibly 283's with Turboglide, also), if used with a Turboglide transmission was even machined to accept a pilot bearing, just a rough hole. I believe after the Turboglide transmission was no longer offered, GM started machining all cranks to accept a pilot bearing. FWIW. Dave
Comment