Question for you numbers people - NCRS Discussion Boards

Question for you numbers people

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ray Dattilo

    Question for you numbers people

    I recently saw a supposed '63 fuelie coupe that was "numbers matching" which was correct except that the engine build date preceded the body build date by almost two months. Is this reasonable? I know that engines with mechanical problems could be pulled off the line and "fixed" and this could take some time but how likely is this? I'm not being completely open here though because the VIN on the engine pad was preceded by an "S" for St. Louis instead of a "3" for the year so I know this was a restamp (assembly plant codes were not included until '68). Still, I wonder, if the idiot had stamped it with a "3" instead, would NCRS accept this as numbers matching? The casting date and block number and suffix code were all consistent.
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43193

    #2
    Re: Question for you numbers people

    Ray-----

    6 months is the allowable "window" for both NCRS and NCCB judging. So, from the date perspective, this car easily falls within the allowable window. In actual practice, the elapsed time between engine build and body build was about 2-4 weeks. However, 2 months would not be way out of the ordinary. Folks at the St. Louis Corvette plant didn't "rotate their stocks" with engines. It was more like first in, last out and last in, first out. Fork lift drivers removing engines from the engine bay grabbed the first one in the bay, which often menat that engines which were in the back of the bay languished there for quite awhile.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • Ray Dattilo

      #3
      Re: Question for you numbers people

      Thanks Joe. I remember reading the 6 mos. thing in the manual, now that you mentioned it. I know the "machining" marks are also important for authentication but I for one have not seen enough original engines to be certain about its appearance.

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15610

        #4
        Re: Question for you numbers people

        Another thing to consider is that a low volume engine option is likely to have more date spread than a more common option. FI was only about 12 percent of production while the other three engines averaged close to 30 percent.

        Especially if Flint built engine configruations in batches, which makes sense, FI engines probably would have, on average, sat around the St. Louis plant longer than the other engines configurations before they were installed in a chassis going down the lilne.

        Duke

        Comment

        • Ray Dattilo

          #5
          Re: Question for you numbers people

          Makes sense Duke.

          Comment

          Working...

          Debug Information

          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"