Re: '66 427/425 UPDATE for Duke Williams
I would like to add my "two" cents here and share with you the following vacuum readings I got from my L-72 engine this weekend. To start with, its an original rebuilt engine with a clone type factory camshaft. The engine has about 5,000 miles on it and I run 5 gallons of 111 octane racing fuel and top it off with Texaco 93 octane. Using a timing tape and a timing gun, and after I drove the car for 40 minutes, please note:
1) Static timing is 10 degrees with the vacuum can line blocked.
2) When I reconnect the vacuum can (original can)to the port opening on the list #3247 Holley carb, timing goes up to around 26 degrees at idle.
3) When I connect the vacuum can line to the port opening located on the rear top of the intake manifold, the timing is 40 degrees.
So, with the factory set-up, as noted in #2 above, I am getting the 26 degrees at idle, which Duke indicated was needed to keep temperatures down. Given this, I see no point in replacing my orginal vacuum can.
Also, how would the car perform if I ran it with the vacuum can line tapped into the intake manifold port oening which resuled in the 40 degree reading at idle? And if this results in better performance, then why didn't GM use this source for vacuum? Thanks
I now believe that my heating problem at idle relates to the radiator and plan to purchase a new core from DeWitt's.
I would like to add my "two" cents here and share with you the following vacuum readings I got from my L-72 engine this weekend. To start with, its an original rebuilt engine with a clone type factory camshaft. The engine has about 5,000 miles on it and I run 5 gallons of 111 octane racing fuel and top it off with Texaco 93 octane. Using a timing tape and a timing gun, and after I drove the car for 40 minutes, please note:
1) Static timing is 10 degrees with the vacuum can line blocked.
2) When I reconnect the vacuum can (original can)to the port opening on the list #3247 Holley carb, timing goes up to around 26 degrees at idle.
3) When I connect the vacuum can line to the port opening located on the rear top of the intake manifold, the timing is 40 degrees.
So, with the factory set-up, as noted in #2 above, I am getting the 26 degrees at idle, which Duke indicated was needed to keep temperatures down. Given this, I see no point in replacing my orginal vacuum can.
Also, how would the car perform if I ran it with the vacuum can line tapped into the intake manifold port oening which resuled in the 40 degree reading at idle? And if this results in better performance, then why didn't GM use this source for vacuum? Thanks
I now believe that my heating problem at idle relates to the radiator and plan to purchase a new core from DeWitt's.
Comment