I was recently asked to comment on the suitability of a 265 block for use in a 1956 Corvette. Since it was a Tonawanda issue part, the short answer was simple: NO. However, I was wondering, the vehicle in question is a very low serial number and should probably utilize a first design motor. Since these had a dip stick that entered the oil pan, was there a different casting for these blocks without a hole for a dip stick tube? Was some version of the earlier (1955) design 265 block used? Even the 1955 style block had a dip stick tube in the block, didn't it? Just curious, can someone enlighten me?
Early 1956 cylinder case
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
- Top
-
Re: Early 1956 cylinder case
Bob, The first few hundred 1956 Corvettes had a dip stick tube on the RIGHT side of the engine. The tube extended from the oil pan. It's these blocks that I'm curious about.- Top
Comment
-
Re: Early 1956 cylinder case
I know about the early 56 blocks in the Vette. I don't think that G.M. revised the block for this useage. I would assume the passageway was pluged with a welch plug or something similar . This also happened with the 305s in a 79 or 80 Chevelle that had the dipstick in the pan. Bob- Top
Comment
-
Re: Early 1956 cylinder case
Bernard-----
The 1956 GM #3720991 cylinder block castings all had the provisions for the oil dip stick tube in the casting. So, either one of 2 things must have been the case for the early 1956 Corvette versions that used the pan-mounted dipstick tube:
1) the Corvette blocks were not machined for the dipstick tube, even though the provisions for it were present on the casting. Remeber that the blcok CASTING number is just that; a CASTING number and more than one FINISHED block part number (and configuration) could have been machined from the same casting; or
2) the dip stick tube hole was machined into the block but was plugged in some wayIn Appreciation of John Hinckley- Top
Comment
Comment