Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter - NCRS Discussion Boards

Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul Latour

    Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

    What was the diameter of the front sway bar on later C3s equipped with RPO FE7? I have just sourced a factory 7/16" rear sway bar and wish to have the proper size on the front (currently 7/8"). If relevant, my 1979 came with RPO F51 heavy duty shocks (GM Canada data for my car).
  • Duke W.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • January 1, 1993
    • 15610

    #2
    Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

    Chevrolet Power Manual says 351596, 1 1/8". The next smallest is the 7/8", 3871318. This is a very big increment when you consider that the anti-roll bar's contribution to roll stiffness is a function of diameter to the fourth power.

    Duke

    Comment

    • Clem Z.
      Expired
      • January 1, 2006
      • 9427

      #3
      Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

      the 1 1/8" dia. may be a tubular bar.

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15610

        #4
        Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

        Not positive, but I think its solid. I don't think hollow section tubular bars started until the eighties. I'm sure Joe would know.

        Duke

        Comment

        • Paul Latour

          #5
          Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

          Thank you for that answer. So I have the non-FE7 front bar. As noted, I will soon have the rear 7/16" sway bar. I just checked Richard Prince's book and he states that the rear bar was 9/16" in 1979. I think he is wrong on that. It was my understanding that the 9/16" rear bar was for pre-1975 BBs and FE7/Z07 applications. It should be interesting to see how the 7/8" front and 7/16" combination works for street driving. If it does not I will find a 1 1/8" for the front.

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43193

            #6
            Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

            Duke and Clem-----

            The 75-82 FE-7 front bar, GM #351596, was a solid bar. It's precise, "official" OD was 27.55 mm.

            Also, there was a PRODUCTION Corvette sway bar which was between the GM #351596 and the 65-74 standard suspension big block front bar, GM #3871318, which was the 7/8" bar. That bar was the 63-74 F-40/F-41 front bar, GM #3831972, which was 15/16" OD or 1" OD, depending upon where you measure it.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Joe L.
              Beyond Control Poster
              • February 1, 1988
              • 43193

              #7
              Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

              Paul-----

              Richard Prince is definitely incorrect on the OD of the 75-82 FE-7 rear sway bar. All 1975-82 Corvettes with FE-7 used a solid rear sway bar of 7/16" OD and GM #351597. It's precise, "official" dimension was 11.12 mm.

              The 9/16" OD rear bars, of which there were at least 2 slightly different configurations, were used for 1965-74 big block applications, regardless of whether they were standard or F-41 suspension. The 9/16" rear bar, or any other rear bar, was not part of F-41 HD suspension packages used from 1963-74.
              In Appreciation of John Hinckley

              Comment

              • Paul Latour

                #8
                Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

                Thanks Joe. Much appreciated. One of the reasons I went for the GM 7/16" rear bar was originality. The second was that I perceived overkill in the aftermarket packages: the smallest bar available seems to be 9/16".

                Comment

                • Chas Kingston

                  #9
                  Re: Don't you just love - - - - - - - - - -

                  The dimensioning of the bar to the absurd 0.01mm. They certainly weren't manufactured to that kind of tolerance. Gee, I get out my trusty HP41CX (my slide rule isn't too good at decimals) and I find that dimension is to less than half a thou. 400 micro-inches, actually. Did they surface grind those puppies?

                  Geezer

                  Comment

                  • Joe L.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • February 1, 1988
                    • 43193

                    #10
                    Re: Don't you just love - - - - - - - - - -

                    Geezer----

                    I expect that the "official" dimension was actually a conversion from the english system of dimensions performed by someone that didn't understand the concept of "significant figures".
                    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                    Comment

                    • Chas Kingston

                      #11
                      Re: Don't you just love - - - - - - - - - -

                      Yup.

                      I am continually amused that our car, on the Bonneville Salt Flats, was "clocked" at 622.407 mph using a timer that was good to 0.001 sec. Thus, as the flying mile took something less than 6 seconds, the clock was good to one part in six thousand. But, they reported the speed 100 times more accurately than that.

                      For those who are curious:


                      The Blue Flame

                      Comment

                      • Paul Latour

                        #12
                        Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

                        Any predictions as to how the car will handle with this hybridized set-up?

                        Comment

                        • Duke W.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • January 1, 1993
                          • 15610

                          #13
                          Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

                          If it oversteers, install a larger front bar!

                          Duke

                          Comment

                          • Paul Latour

                            #14
                            Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

                            I'll give it a try and see what happens. My major dilemma now is the the frame bracket bushings (#351600) are GM-discontinued. The link bushings (#3872955) are still out there. I confirmed this today (I work at a GM dealership). Joe L. pointed me to Dr. Rebuild and they do show in his catalogue as #7242207 at $15.00 each. So that is one route. If he has them. Our GM parts people say there may be a work-around with more recent bushings but that is a compromise. Anyone with a couple of those bushings available?

                            Comment

                            • Duke W.
                              Beyond Control Poster
                              • January 1, 1993
                              • 15610

                              #15
                              Re: Post-1974 C3 FE7 Front Sway Bar Diameter

                              I would recommend urethane link bushings if originality is not a big concern as they will make the front bar more effective by eliminating compliance at high roll angles, which can cause many cars to transition to oversteer at the limit.

                              I would also recommend the OEM type rubber pillow block bushings to maintain harshness isolation.

                              Duke

                              Comment

                              Working...

                              Debug Information

                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"