69 L89 At Barrett-jackson - NCRS Discussion Boards

69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Michael J.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • January 27, 2009
    • 7073

    #16
    Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

    I agree, looks odd. But there have been some very low mile cars with lots of things replaced/tacked-on. Like that white '67 coupe that sold recently for lots of money, and a local car museum has a 1.5 mile 1959 Corvette that has tons of parts changed out, but he claims he has all the originals but the owner liked all the aftermarket stuff. Go figure.
    Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

    Comment

    • Mike F.
      Expired
      • April 25, 2011
      • 668

      #17
      Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

      Again, IIRC (when speaking with the owner) this car has had a full restoration. It is low miles, but wasn't stored properly, so it needed restored. Most if not all of the parts were original to this car, but cleaned/overhauled/restored as needed. That's what I remember from last April anyway. What I had for lunch yesterday.....who knows?

      Comment

      • Stuart F.
        Expired
        • August 31, 1996
        • 4676

        #18
        Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

        My son also has a 69 L-89 that he plans to run through Mecum here next month. His car is a low mileage older restoration as well that the previous owner had for many years and changed to the side pipes because he liked the sound (ugh!). When I inspected the car with my son a few years back, I wasn't aware that 69's used 2" exhaust pipes so I thought something was wrong. My son has done some detailing and fixing (such as those pesky leaky Holley tri-carbs)' but other than a few things, it is a beautiful car. I don't know which auction runs first, but we'll be watching with keen interest.

        Stu Fox

        Comment

        • Rich G.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • August 31, 2002
          • 1396

          #19
          Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

          Originally posted by Mike Furline (53259)
          Again, IIRC (when speaking with the owner) this car has had a full restoration. It is low miles, but wasn't stored properly, so it needed restored. Most if not all of the parts were original to this car, but cleaned/overhauled/restored as needed. That's what I remember from last April anyway. What I had for lunch yesterday.....who knows?
          My 68 was stored in a leaky UN heated garage from 1973 until 1989. The entire interior was covered in mold. The motor was rusted and locked up, the gas tank rotted out. It had 30K miles on it. Every part was rusty. Everything, shocks, springs etc was removed, cleaned and painted if servieable. If, not it was replaced. The body was not off, but everything was out. The carpets and seats were saved, the shocks, too. The motor was overhauled and one carb had to be replaced. I think the alternator was too. They did manage to save the Sunoco oil change sticker on the door jamb from 1973! 1968/69 was a long time ago when mechanical stuff is not stored properly.

          Rich
          1966 L79 Convertible. Milano Maroon
          1968 L71 Coupe. Rally Red (Sold 6/21)
          1963 Corvair Monza Convertible

          Comment

          • John F.
            Expired
            • January 1, 1979
            • 62

            #20
            Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

            Originally posted by Rich Gianotti (38594)
            My 68 was stored in a leaky UN heated garage from 1973 until 1989. The entire interior was covered in mold. The motor was rusted and locked up, the gas tank rotted out. It had 30K miles on it. Every part was rusty. Everything, shocks, springs etc was removed, cleaned and painted if servieable. If, not it was replaced. The body was not off, but everything was out. The carpets and seats were saved, the shocks, too. The motor was overhauled and one carb had to be replaced. I think the alternator was too. They did manage to save the Sunoco oil change sticker on the door jamb from 1973! 1968/69 was a long time ago when mechanical stuff is not stored properly.

            Rich
            How did you get the mold out of the carpet and seats?

            Comment

            • Rich G.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • August 31, 2002
              • 1396

              #21
              Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

              Originally posted by John Fowler (2238)
              How did you get the mold out of the carpet and seats?
              I wasn't present but from pictures it looked like steam cleaning was involved. The seats weren't that bad but the carpets had large white spots all over them in clumps. I have pictures of the find and the resoration but I didn't own it then. I did know the people who found it and bought it when it was done.

              Rich
              1966 L79 Convertible. Milano Maroon
              1968 L71 Coupe. Rally Red (Sold 6/21)
              1963 Corvair Monza Convertible

              Comment

              • Tom M.
                Expired
                • January 1, 1993
                • 716

                #22
                Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                Thanks for the insite guys, I don't understand the side pipe issue ???
                I hope he has original some docs with the car ......
                It says bill of sale not MSO...??

                Comment

                • Michael J.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • January 27, 2009
                  • 7073

                  #23
                  Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                  It says sold on BOS only. But, it also says the original MSO is included. I am assuming that was never used to title and register the car by the dealer, as is normally done when a dealer gets the MSO and takes it in to MVD to get the title? So I am not clear if a person, this many years later, can take that original MSO along with the BOS and get a title?
                  Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

                  Comment

                  • Norris W.
                    Very Frequent User
                    • December 1, 1982
                    • 683

                    #24
                    Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                    Personally I think it'd be cool to have a car that was never titled and still on MSO. I bought an '03 100th Anniversary Harley to put up and it's still on MSO also. As far as hesitant to buy without title, many states including Georgia don't title older cars. In Georgia 1963 was the first year of titles so it's impossible to have a '62 or older titled. A friend took a '59 to BJ about a decade ago and BJ required titles at that time. State of Arizona had a station set up nearby and they ran his VIN number through the system and since it showed clean he was issued an Arizona title. Also it is legal in Georgia to transfer and register a vehicle that is built prior to '85 and in some cases cars over 15 yrs, but what these cases are I'm unclear on. Once Georgia registers a vehicle as bill of sale transfer of ownership it can never have another Georgia title issued. They've also gotten difficult to get a replacement title on any vehicle built before 1985, but it seems to be arbitrary on whether or not a person at local Tax Office wants to put their coffee cup down long enough to fill out the form.

                    I hope these '69 (and '68's also) L89's begin to take off some. They've been flat as a flounder since the beginning.

                    Comment

                    • Joe L.
                      Beyond Control Poster
                      • February 1, 1988
                      • 43193

                      #25
                      Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                      Originally posted by Gene Manno (8571)
                      Why would side pipes be added to a car that has less than 400 miles? The entire front of the engine has gobs of orange paint applied, again why? Too much under the hood that does not look 45 years old. Such things as the master cylinder cover and wiper canister look fresh as hell. A arm cup washers and bolts has no black? Exhaust manifolds cast sprayed? Not a truthful surviver as too much looks fussed with for 400 miles.

                      Gene-------


                      I guarantee the wiper door actuator and master cylinder cover are not original to the car or, at least, the plating of same is not original. Not only do they appear "fresh", but they also do not appear, at all, the way they did originally. To me. it stands out "like a sore thumb".
                      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                      Comment

                      • Jeffrey S.
                        Extremely Frequent Poster
                        • May 31, 1988
                        • 1879

                        #26
                        Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                        Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
                        Gene-------


                        I guarantee the wiper door actuator and master cylinder cover are not original to the car or, at least, the plating of same is not original. Not only do they appear "fresh", but they also do not appear, at all, the way they did originally. To me. it stands out "like a sore thumb".
                        Likewise the ignition shield cover with pure white rivets, etc.
                        Jeff

                        Comment

                        • Bob D.
                          NCRS Shipping Data Report Manager
                          • April 30, 1996
                          • 785

                          #27
                          Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                          The wiper actuator is a repop.

                          Comment

                          • Tom M.
                            Expired
                            • January 1, 1993
                            • 716

                            #28
                            Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                            Nice looking car
                            I like it

                            Comment

                            • Tom M.
                              Expired
                              • January 1, 1993
                              • 716

                              #29
                              Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson



                              Here is my 69 L89, With factory side exhaust .......Yes it's Al Wagner's old car.

                              Comment

                              • Loren L.
                                Extremely Frequent Poster
                                • April 30, 1976
                                • 4104

                                #30
                                Re: 69 L89 At Barrett-jackson

                                I think there's also a 68/9 red L89 coupe at B-J at "No Reserve".

                                Comment

                                Working...

                                Debug Information

                                Searching...Please wait.
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                Search Result for "|||"