Re: Adding aftermarket coolant recovery tank to 68-72 big block AC car
The coolant recovery system was used to deal with a specific situation. All systems must have provisions for expansion of the coolant. The simplest was air space in a tank above the core. The core was always completely full with additional liquid (ensuring it stayed full) and air space above it. The coolant expands and displaces the air. Over filled it pushes the excess out. When cooled, air returns. Finds it's level then operates as it should.
Cross flow rads with side tanks using that same system to provide the airspace would be using up valuable and expensive core space just to hold air. The tank can not simply sit on top because coolant would simply run across and bypass the core. So they had to come up with an alternate arrangement for cross flow rads.
One was to completely fill the rad, no air space, and let the coolant travel back and forth between the rad and the coolant recovery tank. Expansion pushes the coolant through the cap while maintaining system pressure, then allows it to draw back when the coolant cools and contracts.
The other way to keep the core full is to provide a remote tank within the pressurized system mounted above the height of the top of the rad. Now the rad stays completely full and you can have air space in the tank. This is how it is done on your car and most cars built today.
The little bid of additional coolant you would add to the system by eliminating the air space in the tank in favour of a coolant recovery system would be of no benefit. It's adding a second solution to a problem already dealth with.
Steve
The coolant recovery system was used to deal with a specific situation. All systems must have provisions for expansion of the coolant. The simplest was air space in a tank above the core. The core was always completely full with additional liquid (ensuring it stayed full) and air space above it. The coolant expands and displaces the air. Over filled it pushes the excess out. When cooled, air returns. Finds it's level then operates as it should.
Cross flow rads with side tanks using that same system to provide the airspace would be using up valuable and expensive core space just to hold air. The tank can not simply sit on top because coolant would simply run across and bypass the core. So they had to come up with an alternate arrangement for cross flow rads.
One was to completely fill the rad, no air space, and let the coolant travel back and forth between the rad and the coolant recovery tank. Expansion pushes the coolant through the cap while maintaining system pressure, then allows it to draw back when the coolant cools and contracts.
The other way to keep the core full is to provide a remote tank within the pressurized system mounted above the height of the top of the rad. Now the rad stays completely full and you can have air space in the tank. This is how it is done on your car and most cars built today.
The little bid of additional coolant you would add to the system by eliminating the air space in the tank in favour of a coolant recovery system would be of no benefit. It's adding a second solution to a problem already dealth with.
Steve
Comment