Strut rods - NCRS Discussion Boards

Strut rods

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Frank K.
    Expired
    • January 1, 2000
    • 319

    Strut rods

    What are better for the C3 , fixed or adjustable?
  • Michael W.
    Expired
    • April 1, 1997
    • 4290

    #2
    Re: Strur rods

    Neither, it's two different ways to achieve exactly the same thing. Avoid either type with poly bushings.

    Comment

    • Steve G.
      Expired
      • November 24, 2014
      • 411

      #3
      Re: Strur rods

      Contrary to popular belief, they are not the same and do not do the same thing. The oe setup moves the pivot point while keeping the arm exactly the same length to adjust the camber. The adjustable rods changes the length of the rod to change the camber. That is a very significant difference.

      The front and rear of your car uses a suspension system known as long arm/short arm. Google for a complete explanation, but in a nutshell, the different length radii carve different arcs as they swing through their travel. The outer end of the short arm travels a tighter arc so as it swings the top moves inboard more than the longer arm through the same amount of travel. This causes the bottom of the tire pivot at the outer end of the strut rod and to "kick out" so as to maintain track width at the contact point with the road.

      The difference in the length of these two members was not arbitrary, but rather was carefully calculated to create the correct amount of correction at the bottom of the tire. Changing the length of one of the arms throws that movement off.

      I've heard some say that the change in the length of the arm is to small to make much of a difference. I disagree with that. I have seen where you can easily change the length from the original by half an inch to achieve correct camber with an adjustable rod, especially if your stub shafts are worn. The difference in length between the half shaft measured at it's pivot points and the strut rod is only about 2". Changing that dimension by 1/4 to 1/2" represents a 12.5 to 25% change to a crucial dimension.

      Steve

      Comment

      • Joe L.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • February 1, 1988
        • 43193

        #4
        Re: Strut rods

        Originally posted by Frank Keel (33462)
        What are better for the C3 , fixed or adjustable?

        Frank-------


        Personally, I recommend and use ONLY stock-type strut rods with stock-type bushings.

        One thing I will add, though: 1963-74 Corvettes used strut rods with 1-1/4" bushings. 1975-82 Corvettes used strut rods with 1-3/8" bushings. The 1975-79 strut rods are also SERVICE for 1963-74. I feel pretty confident that GM made this change for a good reason. I can also tell you that my original 1-1/4" bushing strut rods had the bushings deteriorate and "squeeze out" fairly quickly affecting, among other things, rear wheel camber. At some point I changed to the 75-79 rods. After that I never had any problems whatsoever with the bushings or rear camber.
        In Appreciation of John Hinckley

        Comment

        Working...

        Debug Information

        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"