1959 VIN #s vs Block casting dates/assembly dates log - NCRS Discussion Boards

1959 VIN #s vs Block casting dates/assembly dates log

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Al R.
    Very Frequent User
    • June 30, 1988
    • 687

    1959 VIN #s vs Block casting dates/assembly dates log

    Has anyone tried putting together a log of engine casting dates/ assembly dates vs the assembly dates of 1959 vettes (or for that matter any of the C1 or C2 cars)? I'm sure this would be a mountainous task, but was just wondering , if it had ever been attempted? I know there used to be surveys requested on the earlier cars to help verify when production changes occurred, etc. or for RPO stuff. Just thought it might help identify some of the counterfeit engines out there, but with the wide range of dates and/or allowance for rework/repair of faulty engines at start-up on the assembly line, I guess there is a chance for the odd ball date that would truly be way off per the judging standards that was factory correct. I guess mainly what I'm looking for is a co-relation between a set # of cars within a particular serial # range with the casting/build dates of the blocks/engines also closely related so as to form a pattern.
  • John H.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • December 1, 1997
    • 16513

    #2
    Re: 1959 VIN #s vs Block casting dates/assembly dates log

    Originally posted by Al Rains (13251)
    Has anyone tried putting together a log of engine casting dates/ assembly dates vs the assembly dates of 1959 vettes (or for that matter any of the C1 or C2 cars)? I'm sure this would be a mountainous task, but was just wondering , if it had ever been attempted? I know there used to be surveys requested on the earlier cars to help verify when production changes occurred, etc. or for RPO stuff. Just thought it might help identify some of the counterfeit engines out there, but with the wide range of dates and/or allowance for rework/repair of faulty engines at start-up on the assembly line, I guess there is a chance for the odd ball date that would truly be way off per the judging standards that was factory correct. I guess mainly what I'm looking for is a co-relation between a set # of cars within a particular serial # range with the casting/build dates of the blocks/engines also closely related so as to form a pattern.
    Al -

    Noland's Vol.II book ('63-'67) has LOTS of that engine survey data; don't recall offhand if his Vol. I ('53-'62) book has similar survey data or not.

    Comment

    • Jim D.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • June 30, 1985
      • 2882

      #3
      Re: 1959 VIN #s vs Block casting dates/assembly dates log

      Originally posted by John Hinckley (29964)
      Al -

      Noland's Vol.II book ('63-'67) has LOTS of that engine survey data; don't recall offhand if his Vol. I ('53-'62) book has similar survey data or not.
      Unfortunately, Vol.1 has very little survey data and only lists 5 1959 cars with associated engine numbers. I can PM them to you Al if you don't have that info.

      Comment

      • Loren L.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • April 30, 1976
        • 4104

        #4
        Re: 1959 VIN #s vs Block casting dates/assembly dates log

        !st, Engines are NOT FIFO; there's also probably no records about when Engines are delivered to the Engine room - and how many are left in the room when the new shipment arrives.

        Comment

        • Al R.
          Very Frequent User
          • June 30, 1988
          • 687

          #5
          Re: 1959 VIN #s vs Block casting dates/assembly dates log

          Just curious as to how the dates and assembly dates matched up with the build dates on the cars with any particular patterns. Guess then, I should not even bring up the issue of fuel Injection unit serial #s.

          Comment

          Working...

          Debug Information

          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"