I am fortunate enough to have a fairly original 63 SWC.
I am finishing up the frame details and have had almost no luck with the catalog fasteners.
Case and point:
The fasteners that hold the clamps on the tie rod ends. (through the clamp bolts)
Here are the one that came off the car next to the reproduction.

Didn't even get the thread correct as the original is a NC and the replacement NF.
Length was off by a 1/16, no biggy there.

Head marks not even close. Although I get the bolts are listed for 63-67.
Nuts were of the locking style (crimped nuts) didn't match the original either.
I was getting tired of tracking the original bolts and in a hurry, getting close to the body drop.
I give.
If I have the originals they are going back on, period.
Had it with catalog bolts.
I have one other example to share.
Lower A arm bumper attachment bolts.
In the manual it list them as black phosphate oiled bolts.
As you might imagine the original finish for these bolts was long gone.
I have a picture of the head of the original bolts after glass beading and the replacement.

Head markings are different, I could likely live with that but the color is zinc not black phosphate per the manual.

The provided nut is on upside down so i could balance it for the picture.
You can see the captive washer is flat not of the lock style as original.
However the length and pitch were correct this time.
The black nut on the old bolt is a new on and i plan on using it after I get the bolts re-plated.
No way this passes judging with the color not even close and the color detail in the manual.
Plating is a pain, Eastwood has materials to do this I know. I send mine out.
However buyer beware, its all BS as far as the catalog bolts go.
Rick Geier
I am finishing up the frame details and have had almost no luck with the catalog fasteners.
Case and point:
The fasteners that hold the clamps on the tie rod ends. (through the clamp bolts)
Here are the one that came off the car next to the reproduction.
Didn't even get the thread correct as the original is a NC and the replacement NF.
Length was off by a 1/16, no biggy there.
Head marks not even close. Although I get the bolts are listed for 63-67.
Nuts were of the locking style (crimped nuts) didn't match the original either.
I was getting tired of tracking the original bolts and in a hurry, getting close to the body drop.
I give.
If I have the originals they are going back on, period.
Had it with catalog bolts.
I have one other example to share.
Lower A arm bumper attachment bolts.
In the manual it list them as black phosphate oiled bolts.
As you might imagine the original finish for these bolts was long gone.
I have a picture of the head of the original bolts after glass beading and the replacement.
Head markings are different, I could likely live with that but the color is zinc not black phosphate per the manual.
The provided nut is on upside down so i could balance it for the picture.
You can see the captive washer is flat not of the lock style as original.
However the length and pitch were correct this time.
The black nut on the old bolt is a new on and i plan on using it after I get the bolts re-plated.
No way this passes judging with the color not even close and the color detail in the manual.
Plating is a pain, Eastwood has materials to do this I know. I send mine out.
However buyer beware, its all BS as far as the catalog bolts go.
Rick Geier
Comment