A search here turns up a lot of useful information (including my similar question last year) about upper and lower control arm bushings for the C3. I see Moog, Napa and the usual vendors besides the potentially available GM numbers that Joe L provided. I have a brand new edition of the 1970-72 TIM&JG coming in the mail. While I await that manual, my question is - are any of the aforementioned control arm bushings better in the judging field that any other? I recognize that my lightly driven car's new bushings will probably outlive me and I wont be going to polyurethane - thus the question. And a similar question on ball joints, does one judge better than another?
I full intend to do my CAs in the next week or two and I may even take them up to Bairs, less than 100 miles from me, for riveted ball joints. I will inspect them shortly after removal of the CAs. My old manuals do not really address point loss on a riveted versus ball joint and I haven't been on the judging field in well more than 10 years.
Gary
I full intend to do my CAs in the next week or two and I may even take them up to Bairs, less than 100 miles from me, for riveted ball joints. I will inspect them shortly after removal of the CAs. My old manuals do not really address point loss on a riveted versus ball joint and I haven't been on the judging field in well more than 10 years.
Gary
) or for reproduction/aftermarket appearance. Given that, I am going to look long and hard at these parts once I take my car out of hibernation. I need to evaluate the ride and see if there is any appreciable deterioration in the ride that can be attributed to bushings. There certainly isn't any rattling or other noises suggesting that the bushings are bad but they have looked like that when I bought the car 17 or 18 years ago. It could be that I am used to ride and assume that it is normal. Some more reading needed here to determine this. I am not "bound and determined" to replace them but I am determined to properly evaluate them.
Comment