1964 327/375HP correct Head bolt marking

[Leif A.]

Re: 1964 327/375HP correct Head bolt matking

Interesting, I loaded it exactly the same ways as the others. Does the link work?

Yes, it does Pat.

[John B.]

Re: 1964 327/375HP correct Head bolt matking

Pat,
I see it now, thank you very much. I'm trying to find new ones, but they all look different in some ways. Rather not try to hunt down used ones.
I gusrr there are worse things than a few bolts. Not trying for a Top Flight vehicle, but very nice well put together car to enjoy.
Again, thank you very much. It is greatly appreciated.
John

[Joe L.]

Re: 1964 327/375HP correct Head bolt matking

Pat,
I see it now, thank you very much. I'm trying to find new ones, but they all look different in some ways. Rather not try to hunt down used ones.
I gusrr there are worse things than a few bolts. Not trying for a Top Flight vehicle, but very nice well put together car to enjoy.
Again, thank you very much. It is greatly appreciated.
John

John------

The manufacturer's ID mark in the center varies and the only way to know what your engine was built with is to have the original bolts. Two common manufacturer's headmarking are "C", and "TR". There were likely others as these things were being used in huge numbers.

AMK Products has excellent reproductions and, as I recall, they offer both the "C" and "TR" headmarkings.

[John F.]

Re: 1964 327/375HP correct Head bolt matking

This is the best I have on my 365hp. Hope it goes through.

[Tom D.]

Re: 1964 327/375HP correct Head bolt matking

For what it is worth, the first photo I can see (using Safari on my Apple laptop) is in post #11. The link works too.

[Richard G.]

Re: 1964 327/375HP correct Head bolt matking


1963 340HP Original Bolts