I realize this is an old issue/topic and I felt my comments would be best connected to the following thread:
https://www.forums.ncrs.org/showthre...+Delco+Moraine
It appears that Lonestar does not have any DOT 5 warnings on their warranty or installation instructions for either the lip seal or O-ring calipers. Does anyone have info that shows otherwise? Additionally, I recently received lip seal caliper rebuild kits made by Raybestos and there is no notice whatsoever about using DOT 5 fluid. I would think that if it were a problem with their products they'd certainly make it known.
As an aside, I find it humorous that Corvette Stainless Steel Brakes Inc. put Will Void Warranty in quotation marks. Who are they quoting? (As a teacher for elementary school literacy, I'd have to ding my kids if they used quotation marks inappropriately.) The link they offer as back up proof of problems with DOT 5 contains not one reference to any DOT spec and appears a misdirection for their justification.
Here's the background of why this came up for me: I am in the process of rebuilding/replacing my '72s brake system. After about 28 years of storage the fluid had evaporated/jelled/dried to powder in all of the components -- probably DOT 3 or 4 but I don't recall. I have changed out the brake lines and rebuilt the master cylinder. The front calipers were changed to sleeved SS from Vette Brakes and Products 30 years ago; other than a couple of dark stains there is no indication the liners have suffered. I plan on having the caliper halves' mating surfaces machined because they seem a tad rusted and I want to be sure they mate well. I believe the rear calipers are original to the car, the bores are pitted and must be replaced.
I also have a '67 which has had sleeved lip seal calipers since the mid-80s-ish. Since day one they have had DOT 5 fluid and show no signs of leaking or any sort of spongy pedal. I'd like the same performance with the '72. Which brings me to my research on what's out there. I realize there is quite the contingent of O-ring believers, but it's hard to argue against 35 years of positive lip seal experience.
No real question here, just yakking.
https://www.forums.ncrs.org/showthre...+Delco+Moraine
It appears that Lonestar does not have any DOT 5 warnings on their warranty or installation instructions for either the lip seal or O-ring calipers. Does anyone have info that shows otherwise? Additionally, I recently received lip seal caliper rebuild kits made by Raybestos and there is no notice whatsoever about using DOT 5 fluid. I would think that if it were a problem with their products they'd certainly make it known.
As an aside, I find it humorous that Corvette Stainless Steel Brakes Inc. put Will Void Warranty in quotation marks. Who are they quoting? (As a teacher for elementary school literacy, I'd have to ding my kids if they used quotation marks inappropriately.) The link they offer as back up proof of problems with DOT 5 contains not one reference to any DOT spec and appears a misdirection for their justification.
Here's the background of why this came up for me: I am in the process of rebuilding/replacing my '72s brake system. After about 28 years of storage the fluid had evaporated/jelled/dried to powder in all of the components -- probably DOT 3 or 4 but I don't recall. I have changed out the brake lines and rebuilt the master cylinder. The front calipers were changed to sleeved SS from Vette Brakes and Products 30 years ago; other than a couple of dark stains there is no indication the liners have suffered. I plan on having the caliper halves' mating surfaces machined because they seem a tad rusted and I want to be sure they mate well. I believe the rear calipers are original to the car, the bores are pitted and must be replaced.
I also have a '67 which has had sleeved lip seal calipers since the mid-80s-ish. Since day one they have had DOT 5 fluid and show no signs of leaking or any sort of spongy pedal. I'd like the same performance with the '72. Which brings me to my research on what's out there. I realize there is quite the contingent of O-ring believers, but it's hard to argue against 35 years of positive lip seal experience.
No real question here, just yakking.
Comment