67 lower A arm rubber bumper

[Danny P.]

So what the update on the 1967 lower A arm rubber bumper , is the nut up or the bolt up

[Jack H.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

Survey still going on above in the "Sticky Threads" section for 65 & 66. Seems like bolt head up and nut down is currently winning. Not sure if this applies to 67 or not but FYI in case you missed it.

[Gary B.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

The last time I tallied the data in the sticky, it was 7 examples of heads up, 4 examples of heads down. Which suggests to me either way is acceptable for judging.

Gary

[Mike M.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

agree with gary. i've seen them both ways on unrestored c-2's. mike mccagh

[Richard M.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

agree with gary. i've seen them both ways on unrestored c-2's. mike mccagh

Me too.

Rich

[Danny P.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

agree with gary. i've seen them both ways on unrestored c-2's. mike mccagh

I switch mine around with the nut up , Judge told me they came with nut up , will see what happensIMG_4195_InPixio.jpg

[Gary B.]

[Danny P.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper


Gary , it also says in the '67 JG on top page 186 in chassis and there also a photo.

[Gary J.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

Yet when you look at the AIMS it show the bolt on top.

[Gary B.]

[Mark L.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

Picture is of a late unrestored 66. You can see the nuts are down.

[Gary J.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

The manuals should be updated to say either or up or down. Judges should quit taking a point deduction.

[Gary B.]

[Gary B.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

Picture is of a late unrestored 66. You can see the nuts are down.

[Kenneth F.]

Re: 67 lower A arm rubber bumper

My unrestored '66 has the bolts up.

Ken