1963 original engine - NCRS Discussion Boards

1963 original engine

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David H.
    Expired
    • November 11, 2009
    • 777

    1963 original engine

    Attached Files
  • Harry S.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • July 31, 2002
    • 5258

    #2
    Re: 1963 original engine

    Do you have the original transmission in the car? If you believe you do and the gears have not been changed and it's a close ration trans, then the car was 340 or 360 hp. If it was 360, then there are some tell tale signs to look for if it's a no hit car.

    Otherwise it was a wide ratio trans and the car was 250 or 300 hp. Do you have the owner history on the car?


    Comment

    • Michael G.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • November 12, 2008
      • 2155

      #3

      Comment

      • Duke W.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • January 1, 1993
        • 15610

        #4
        Re: 1963 original engine

        5300 tach redline... 250 or 300 HP. 6500 redline... 340 or 360 HP engine, and in a car this late the oil pressure gage would probably be calibrated to 80 psi on these two mechanical lifter engines. If the trans is original it will have the abbreviated VIN stamped on it.

        If the redline is 6500 there are other things that can tell if it was a 340 or 360 HP engine. If 5500 there's nothing else to distinguish if it was a 250 or 300 HP engine unless the original manifold and carburetor are on the later engine.

        The most common drivetrain combination in '63 was the 300HP-four speed.

        Duke

        Comment

        • David H.
          Expired
          • November 11, 2009
          • 777

          #5
          Re: 1963 original engine

          Thank you all for responding.
          of course, the tac!
          its 6500 redline.
          that narrows it down to the 340 or 360.
          Attached some pictures of the engine compartment.
          I doubt it was a fuelie but one never knows.
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • Michael G.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • November 12, 2008
            • 2155

            #6
            Re: 1963 original engine

            There are no holes in the driver’s side wheel well for the fuelie air cleaner, that tends to suggest a 340. The driver’s side exhaust manifold would appear to have once been on a fuelie, though for some unknown reason its hole looks partially plugged. Not sure what to make of that.

            If you post a pic of the other exhaust manifold and its a real, ultra-rare fuelie manifold, you may have a case for a fuelie…

            Comment

            • Jimmy B.
              Expired
              • July 31, 1980
              • 584

              #7
              Re: 1963 original engine

              check your radiator saddle, 63 f.i. unique

              Comment

              • David H.
                Expired
                • November 11, 2009
                • 777

                #8
                Re: 1963 original engine

                Ok, what am I looking for?

                Comment

                • Edward J.
                  Extremely Frequent Poster
                  • September 15, 2008
                  • 6940

                  #9
                  Re: 1963 original engine

                  Dave, does there appear to be any holes for the fuel injection emblem? Sometimes they get filled in when car gets painted? Take a picture of inner driver fender.
                  New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.

                  Comment

                  • David H.
                    Expired
                    • November 11, 2009
                    • 777

                    #10
                    Re: 1963 original engine

                    Like this?
                    Attached Files

                    Comment

                    • David H.
                      Expired
                      • November 11, 2009
                      • 777

                      #11
                      Re: 1963 original engine

                      Checked again after finding out where it goes. Just below the crossed flags. No sign of any previous holes.
                      Attached Files

                      Comment

                      • David H.
                        Expired
                        • November 11, 2009
                        • 777

                        #12
                        Re: 1963 original engine

                        Checked again after finding out where it goes. Just below the crossed flags. No sign of any previous holes.

                        Comment

                        • Richard M.
                          Super Moderator
                          • August 31, 1988
                          • 11302

                          #13
                          Re: 1963 original engine

                          David,

                          Did you order a Shipping Data Report? Another avenue would be a history search, starting with the dealer, albeit a long and arduous process to try to locate any original paperwork for it.

                          You never know what you could discover.

                          Rich

                          Comment

                          • David H.
                            Expired
                            • November 11, 2009
                            • 777

                            #14
                            Re: 1963 original engine

                            The shipping data report is on my list. Thanks

                            Comment

                            • David H.
                              Expired
                              • November 11, 2009
                              • 777

                              #15
                              Re: 1963 original engine

                              Richard, where do I get the shipping data report?

                              Comment

                              Working...

                              Debug Information

                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"