Change

[Jim L.]

Re: Change

I have been around only since early 2009, and I am very concerned about all this.

You should be. This situation smells worse than a rotting animal corpse.

[Phillip P.]

Re: Change

Amen brother!

[Ed N.]

Re: Change

I don't question your opinion or position, so don't question mine.

[Ed N.]

Re: Change

I'll ask again...... So you are OK with the underhanded manner by which Ms Urton attained the title of president?

I don't question your opinion or position, so don't question mine.

[Jim L.]

Re: Change

I don't question you opinion or position, so don't question mine.

Sorry. It don't work that way. I asked you a legitimate question. Are you OK with the sleazy manner in which this coup was accomplished?

If you are, that tells me all I need to know about your moral compass.

As far as my position/opinion, it will withstand the light of day. Trust me.

Jim

[Phillip P.]

Re: Change

Well stated Roy. Unfortunately, politics cannot be avoided when dealing with human beings. Mike thank you for your dedicated service to the NCRS.

[Ed N.]

Re: Change

Sorry. It don't work that way. I asked you a legitimate question. Are you OK with the sleazy manner in which this coup was accomplished?

If you are, that tells me all I need to know about your moral compass.

As far as my position/opinion, it will withstand the light of day. Trust me.

Jim

Careful, now you're getting a little personal. Don't let your keyboard courage get the best of you.

[Mark S.]

Re: Change

Roy: I also support your proposition! And I will always consider you a friend!

[Jim L.]

Re: Change

Careful, now you're getting a little personal. Don't let your keyboard courage get the best of you.

I AM being careful. I would ask you the same question to your face. Are you OK with the sleazy manner in which this regime changed happened?

Apparently you are and that informs my conclusion about your ethics which seem consistent with those of Ms. Urton.

[David H.]

Re: Change

... the sleazy manner ....

Jim

Folks are missing the forest for the trees.

Purpose of this change was NOT "sleazy manner". Purpose of this change is an AGENDA that, so far, remains hidden.

What is going to change? Why a change now? Agenda?

Don't like the manner, but "sleazy" wasn't the purpose of this vote.

Dave

[James G.]

Re: Disgusting

I've been an NCRS member for a while. For an even longer period, I've understood the clear difference between honorable and underhanded behavior. This kind of slimy crap from the NCRS Board is unacceptable. No good will come of it. It isn't just extremely insulting to Mike, it WILL discourage some good people from participating heavily in the NCRS in the future.

I AGREE JERRY.........Time to hang up my driving shoes.

[Michael J.]

Re: Change

Agreed David, what is the new agenda, and why?

[Scott V.]

Re: Change

As a new member both national and local (Texas Chapter) I really have no dog in this hunt. However it is disappointing to see how political and disingenuous the election process for leadership appears to be.

[Ed N.]

Re: Change

I AM being careful. I would ask you the same question to your face. Are you OK with the sleazy manner in which this regime changed happened?

Apparently you are and that informs my conclusion about your ethics which seem consistent with those of Ms. Urton.

Look forward to it.

[Gary B.]

Re: Change




Gary