Re: Leaf spring identification
Thomas,
If you search thru the TDB archives you will find postings that list the spring rate for the 1963 9-leaf, rear spring variously as 162, 163, 192, and 196 lb/in. My notes say the 1963 AMA specs list a spring rate of 162 lb/in for the 3794095, 9-leaf spring. However, a GM engineering drawing that I had access to lists a rate of 192 lb/in for PN 3794095. The same engineering drawing also lists other GM springs including a 7-leaf spring with a rate of 162 lb/in. Given that the leaf thicknesses for the 63 spring are the same as for the 64-74 9-leaf spring, which we “know” has a dual rate of 140/196, with the 196 rate applicable after all leaves are engaged, I would tend to believe the 192 lb/in number that is given in the GM engineering drawing that I viewed for the ‘63 9-leaf spring.
Gary
Thomas,
If you search thru the TDB archives you will find postings that list the spring rate for the 1963 9-leaf, rear spring variously as 162, 163, 192, and 196 lb/in. My notes say the 1963 AMA specs list a spring rate of 162 lb/in for the 3794095, 9-leaf spring. However, a GM engineering drawing that I had access to lists a rate of 192 lb/in for PN 3794095. The same engineering drawing also lists other GM springs including a 7-leaf spring with a rate of 162 lb/in. Given that the leaf thicknesses for the 63 spring are the same as for the 64-74 9-leaf spring, which we “know” has a dual rate of 140/196, with the 196 rate applicable after all leaves are engaged, I would tend to believe the 192 lb/in number that is given in the GM engineering drawing that I viewed for the ‘63 9-leaf spring.
Gary
Comment