C3 69 Pulley-Blues - NCRS Discussion Boards

C3 69 Pulley-Blues

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John A.
    Expired
    • August 31, 2002
    • 172

    C3 69 Pulley-Blues



    Issues with new belts:

    I guess the first thing is to veriify the correct pulleys. This is what I have on the car right now:





    • Do all these pulleys look correct?
    • Is there some variation in belt configuration base on the fact that it was a E69???

    All and any help appreciated.

    Thanks
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43193

    #2
    Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

    Originally posted by John Andre (38638)

    Issues with new belts:
    I guess the first thing is to veriify the correct pulleys. This is what I have on the car right now:




    • Do all these pulleys look correct?
    • Is there some variation in belt configuration base on the fact that it was a E69???

    All and any help appreciated.

    Thanks

    John-----


    Your pulley part numbers are all correct. However, the 3889372 waterpump pulley should be a 3 groove pulley, not a 2 groove.

    The idler pulley does run on the back side of the waterpump belt (1968 didn't, though; it was a conventional grooved pulley idler). Anyway, the belt for the "with idler pulley" (i.e. with C-60) has to be longer than the belt for "without idler pulley" (i.e. without C-60). You never get the idler pulley to work with the captive belt used for non-C-60 applications.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    • John A.
      Expired
      • August 31, 2002
      • 172

      #3
      Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

      Thanks Joe... You are correct - that WP pulley is a 3 groove... I fat fingered it...

      So, back to the WP belt and idler pulley.... take me through the configuration because I'm missing something here....

      Belt 1 - WP/crank/idler(on the back side of the belt)
      Belt 2 - WP/crank/PS
      Belt 3 - PS/Alt
      Belt 4 - WP/SMOG/AC

      So, with this set up, why the longer Belt 1 with or without AC?

      Thanks

      Comment

      • John A.
        Expired
        • August 31, 2002
        • 172

        #4
        Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

        Hey Joe...

        One more question... I have seen vendors offering a cast iron HB pulley... which they describe as correct for 65 - 69 BB up to VIN 24,000... what is the significance of the cast iron over the stampped steel?

        Thanks again

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • February 1, 1988
          • 43193

          #5
          Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

          Originally posted by John Andre (38638)
          Hey Joe...

          One more question... I have seen vendors offering a cast iron HB pulley... which they describe as correct for 65 - 69 BB up to VIN 24,000... what is the significance of the cast iron over the stampped steel?

          Thanks again
          John-----


          The 3863108 cast iron pulley and the 3921923 stamped steel are functionally interchangeable. For 65-67, the 3863108 was used for all big blocks.

          For 1968-69, things changed. In general, the 3863108 was used for L-71, L-89, L-88 and ZL-1 and the 3921923 was used for L-36 and L-68. However, there were variations of this and, in some cases, I believe the 3921923 was used for L-71, L-89, L-88 and ZL-1 and the 3863108 used for some L-36 and L-68 applications.

          The 3921923 was used for all 70-74 Corvette big blocks except 1971 LS-6.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43193

            #6
            Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

            Originally posted by John Andre (38638)
            Thanks Joe... You are correct - that WP pulley is a 3 groove... I fat fingered it...

            So, back to the WP belt and idler pulley.... take me through the configuration because I'm missing something here....

            Belt 1 - WP/crank/idler(on the back side of the belt)
            Belt 2 - WP/crank/PS
            Belt 3 - PS/Alt
            Belt 4 - WP/SMOG/AC

            So, with this set up, why the longer Belt 1 with or without AC?

            Thanks

            John-----


            The water pump to balancer pulley belts used for with and without C-60 for a big block are different, not the same. The with C-60 belt is longer.
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • John A.
              Expired
              • August 31, 2002
              • 172

              #7
              Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

              Joe...

              So, the belt (3940990) (groove 1 - WP pulley) is 1" longer than (3952336) if the car was configured with AC... ????

              But why the longer belt... the idler rides nice on the short belt as well...

              The AC belt runs off of (groove 3 - WP pulley) the outer groove...

              Hence, I dont understand why a car with AC gets the longer WP belt - it seems to have no affect on the operation of the AC system.... and, it doesent really work with the idler...???

              Comment

              • Joe L.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • February 1, 1988
                • 43193

                #8
                Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

                Originally posted by John Andre (38638)
                Joe...

                So, the belt (3940990) (groove 1 - WP pulley) is 1" longer than (3952336) if the car was configured with AC... ????

                But why the longer belt... the idler rides nice on the short belt as well...

                The AC belt runs off of (groove 3 - WP pulley) the outer groove...

                Hence, I dont understand why a car with AC gets the longer WP belt - it seems to have no affect on the operation of the AC system.... and, it doesent really work with the idler...???
                John-----


                Why the idler was used for big block cars with C-60, I do not know. However, if the idler pulley was used with the same belt used for cars without C-60, then the idler would serve no purpose, at all. It would essentially become an "ersatz tensioner" and no tensioner is necessary with the non-C-60 belt---it's a precise size to fit over the pullies and provide correct tension, as-is.

                With the idler pulley arrangement, it's MUCH easier to install the belt since there is now a point of adjustment (i.e. the idler pulley). That may or may not have had something to do with the reason the idler was used. In fact, it's not a bad idea to install an idler pulley on a car without C-60 just to eliminate the PIA captive belt.
                In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                Comment

                • John A.
                  Expired
                  • August 31, 2002
                  • 172

                  #9
                  Re: C3 69 Pulley-Blues

                  Hey Joe,



                  Please take a look at the attached pictures. This is with the 990 belt from Quanta in place... seems there is a size discrepancy. Has anyone had this problem when trying to run the idler pulley configuration?

                  Attached Files

                  Comment

                  Working...

                  Debug Information

                  Searching...Please wait.
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                  There are no results that meet this criteria.
                  Search Result for "|||"